Career development: what do postdocs want and do PIs provide it?
Session details
Date: 2 April 2025
A session led by Dr Rebecca Woodfield of the University of Sheffield, exploring findings from research recently conducted into attitudes and access to postdoc career development, from the perspective of both postdocs and PIs.
Speakers
- Dr Rebecca Woodfield, Careers & Employability Consultant (Researchers), University of Sheffield
Session overview
In this session Dr Rebecca Woodfield gave an overview of research recently conducted (at the time of publication) at the University of Sheffield, looking at attitudes and access to postdoc career development from the perspective of both PIs and postdocs.
The presentation covered key findings from the research and explored what PIs and HEIs can learn from it.
You can find the full presentation slide deck - including detailed summaries of the findings - via the links on the right, along with a one-page session learnings overview. You can also watch the presentation in the video below.
Topics covered
- How can PIs best prepare to offer career development support alongside the other demands of the role?
- What are the similarities and differences between postdoc and PI attitudes to career development?
- What support do postdocs say they need—and they receiving it?
Session resources
1
00:00:05.525 –> 00:00:09.575
Okay, so the review focus on, um, activity, which
2
00:00:10.275 –> 00:00:13.255
had a predominantly non-academic feel to it.
3
00:00:13.315 –> 00:00:15.935
So this is, this is where, um, academics
4
00:00:15.935 –> 00:00:19.175
or researchers were engaging with those organizations
5
00:00:19.365 –> 00:00:20.935
outside academia.
6
00:00:21.595 –> 00:00:24.335
Um, and the reason we wanted to focus on this is partly
7
00:00:24.335 –> 00:00:26.775
because the research and development core that Concord
8
00:00:26.775 –> 00:00:29.255
that is encouraging this, uh, as well
9
00:00:29.255 –> 00:00:32.695
as giving 10 days professional development time in which,
10
00:00:33.155 –> 00:00:36.095
uh, researchers should be able to pursue career
11
00:00:36.155 –> 00:00:38.055
and professional development as suits them.
12
00:00:38.615 –> 00:00:39.815
Actually at the University of Sheffield,
13
00:00:39.815 –> 00:00:43.495
this has been written as 12 days, so it’s one day a month,
14
00:00:43.495 –> 00:00:44.535
which is very generous.
15
00:00:44.995 –> 00:00:47.495
Uh, again, but, but people aren’t making use of it.
16
00:00:47.515 –> 00:00:49.015
So we wanted to know why that was.
17
00:00:49.515 –> 00:00:51.495
Uh, we’re really interested also in the kind
18
00:00:51.495 –> 00:00:52.775
of wider policy support
19
00:00:52.775 –> 00:00:54.375
and conversations that are going on
20
00:00:54.875 –> 00:00:56.855
to encourage Intersectoral mobility.
21
00:00:56.955 –> 00:00:58.135
So some of the work that’s coming out
22
00:00:58.135 –> 00:01:01.215
of the National Council for Universities and business and,
23
00:01:01.375 –> 00:01:04.215
and government policy papers about trying to ensure
24
00:01:04.215 –> 00:01:06.295
that researchers are comfortable moving
25
00:01:06.805 –> 00:01:09.415
from the academic context into other contexts,
26
00:01:10.075 –> 00:01:12.375
and in recognition of the fact that actually,
27
00:01:12.395 –> 00:01:14.695
as we know from, from what little data there is,
28
00:01:14.725 –> 00:01:16.335
most postdocs will, who,
29
00:01:16.475 –> 00:01:18.735
or most of those who start a postdoc journey,
30
00:01:19.205 –> 00:01:23.175
will not stay long-term in academic research.
31
00:01:23.915 –> 00:01:26.335
Um, so, so this was a kind of what we were trying
32
00:01:26.335 –> 00:01:29.855
to understand and what, how these, these drivers were,
33
00:01:29.885 –> 00:01:31.775
were motivating our research.
34
00:01:32.395 –> 00:01:34.295
We focused on the three career development
35
00:01:35.135 –> 00:01:37.735
activity mechanisms, mechanisms that I mentioned before.
36
00:01:37.835 –> 00:01:40.455
So knowledge exchange, consultancy and secondments.
37
00:01:40.675 –> 00:01:43.455
We can argue about whether those are really non-academic
38
00:01:43.455 –> 00:01:46.375
engagement, but for the purposes of this review, we,
39
00:01:46.395 –> 00:01:49.415
we wanted to focus on something concrete, uh, so
40
00:01:49.415 –> 00:01:52.215
that researchers would, would, uh, be able to relate it
41
00:01:52.215 –> 00:01:54.935
to what’s actually on, on offer on the ground here.
42
00:01:55.875 –> 00:01:58.615
We got a little bit of funding through our research culture,
43
00:01:58.915 –> 00:02:01.255
so Research England funding port, uh,
44
00:02:01.355 –> 00:02:04.295
to employ a postdoc part-time to carry out this research.
45
00:02:04.355 –> 00:02:07.455
And that was really, I think, helpful in getting engagement
46
00:02:07.525 –> 00:02:08.815
with other postdocs.
47
00:02:09.355 –> 00:02:13.255
Uh, that person reviewed, uh, relevant policy documents,
48
00:02:14.005 –> 00:02:15.975
conducted two surveys.
49
00:02:16.555 –> 00:02:18.575
Uh, they’re very similar in terms of content,
50
00:02:18.675 –> 00:02:21.095
but obviously slightly different wording for postdocs
51
00:02:21.195 –> 00:02:22.295
and the PIs
52
00:02:22.295 –> 00:02:26.135
and line managers who, uh, engaged with, with those surveys.
53
00:02:26.555 –> 00:02:29.815
And also there were some one-to-one interviews carried out
54
00:02:29.815 –> 00:02:31.175
to kind of flesh out a bit more.
55
00:02:31.175 –> 00:02:35.015
Some of what came out of, uh, the survey findings
56
00:02:36.395 –> 00:02:38.925
very briefly, uh, we are quite pleased
57
00:02:38.925 –> 00:02:39.965
with the response we had.
58
00:02:39.965 –> 00:02:42.965
We got 147 postdocs, uh,
59
00:02:43.065 –> 00:02:45.085
of some shape or form responding.
60
00:02:45.085 –> 00:02:47.325
And that gives you a brief picture of, you know,
61
00:02:47.325 –> 00:02:49.845
the fact these were mostly PDs
62
00:02:49.905 –> 00:02:53.485
or research associates, uh, with, with a range
63
00:02:53.485 –> 00:02:54.805
of titles in, in Sheffield.
64
00:02:54.805 –> 00:02:58.085
But this is predominantly grade seven, uh, staff
65
00:02:58.225 –> 00:03:01.565
who may be on their first, second, potentially even third
66
00:03:02.155 –> 00:03:06.325
postdoc, um, with a few others, uh, thrown in.
67
00:03:06.715 –> 00:03:09.765
Most of our responses were full-time rather than part-time,
68
00:03:09.785 –> 00:03:11.445
but it was good to have that part-time
69
00:03:11.445 –> 00:03:13.245
representation as well.
70
00:03:14.025 –> 00:03:17.485
And we had a reasonably decent, um, spread, uh,
71
00:03:17.705 –> 00:03:18.845
across our faculties.
72
00:03:18.845 –> 00:03:22.285
The arts and humanities faculty is a very small faculty in
73
00:03:22.285 –> 00:03:23.845
terms of the numbers of researchers.
74
00:03:23.845 –> 00:03:26.125
Anyway, so this was fairly representative,
75
00:03:27.005 –> 00:03:28.925
although we, we didn’t go into to trying
76
00:03:28.925 –> 00:03:31.045
to break down into exact proportions.
77
00:03:32.305 –> 00:03:35.525
Um, in terms of the PIs
78
00:03:35.525 –> 00:03:38.485
or line managers, I’ve used typically PI here,
79
00:03:38.485 –> 00:03:41.605
but also this was other line managers as well, for example,
80
00:03:41.625 –> 00:03:43.285
for those who are in, uh, fellowships.
81
00:03:43.985 –> 00:03:48.645
Um, we also had a fairly representative sample in terms of,
82
00:03:48.785 –> 00:03:53.525
uh, different levels of, um, grades at the job
83
00:03:53.585 –> 00:03:56.405
of kind of job titles that people had, as well as the,
84
00:03:56.425 –> 00:03:58.885
the representation across faculty.
85
00:03:59.425 –> 00:04:01.765
So, so we were comfortable in saying these,
86
00:04:01.765 –> 00:04:04.205
these weren’t necessarily representative results,
87
00:04:04.545 –> 00:04:08.725
but they gave us a good, um, sample of, of the kind
88
00:04:08.725 –> 00:04:11.045
of experiences that people having across the
89
00:04:11.135 –> 00:04:13.165
university and across levels.
90
00:04:15.565 –> 00:04:18.065
So the focus of the questions, the surveys
91
00:04:18.065 –> 00:04:21.185
and the interviews was these four key topics.
92
00:04:21.365 –> 00:04:25.105
So firstly, how much interest is there amongst p uh,
93
00:04:25.225 –> 00:04:27.745
postdocs in terms of wanting to engage with this kind
94
00:04:27.745 –> 00:04:30.305
of initiative and PIs in terms
95
00:04:30.305 –> 00:04:33.225
of their interest in supporting career development
96
00:04:33.225 –> 00:04:36.345
opportunities, uh, for, for postdocs which engage
97
00:04:36.345 –> 00:04:38.025
with non-academic audiences.
98
00:04:38.585 –> 00:04:42.585
Secondly, with awareness of the university mechanisms, uh,
99
00:04:42.735 –> 00:04:45.025
such as knowledge exchange, uh,
100
00:04:45.245 –> 00:04:48.065
and, uh, consultancy opportunities in the university,
101
00:04:48.525 –> 00:04:51.905
and awareness of the fact that for, for postdocs
102
00:04:51.925 –> 00:04:55.825
and their PIs that there are these allocated days, um,
103
00:04:56.485 –> 00:04:58.385
10 days according to the concordant,
104
00:04:58.385 –> 00:05:00.985
but actually 12 days in, in terms of, um,
105
00:05:01.435 –> 00:05:03.065
university of Sheffield policy.
106
00:05:03.775 –> 00:05:06.545
Then we wanted to know about what kind of uptake there was
107
00:05:07.205 –> 00:05:09.665
and what the barriers were, uh,
108
00:05:09.665 –> 00:05:11.465
that were stopping people from engaging
109
00:05:11.515 –> 00:05:14.625
where they’d expressed an interest in doing so.
110
00:05:16.605 –> 00:05:19.585
So, before I go on to tell you about our details, uh,
111
00:05:19.605 –> 00:05:22.945
and what we found in terms of our question results, uh,
112
00:05:23.025 –> 00:05:24.345
I want to ask you something,
113
00:05:24.445 –> 00:05:26.945
and I realize this is gonna be a guesstimate perhaps
114
00:05:27.045 –> 00:05:29.425
for many of you, but it’d be interested to gauge
115
00:05:29.495 –> 00:05:32.185
what you understand in terms of the levels
116
00:05:32.245 –> 00:05:36.465
of interest in your, uh, in your schools.
117
00:05:36.565 –> 00:05:40.865
So I’m gonna pop into the chat bar, um, the,
118
00:05:41.565 –> 00:05:44.865
uh, links for, for this information, unless either James
119
00:05:44.885 –> 00:05:46.625
or Kerry can, can do that for me.
120
00:05:46.785 –> 00:05:49.385
I can’t even find my chat bar at the moment.
121
00:05:50.365 –> 00:05:54.385
Um, but we will add the, the, uh, information there
122
00:05:54.385 –> 00:05:55.585
where you might be able to click on that
123
00:05:55.585 –> 00:05:56.665
through this, this screen.
124
00:05:57.305 –> 00:05:58.685
And if you could have a look at that and,
125
00:05:58.705 –> 00:06:01.685
and just have a guesstimate as to what the kind of level
126
00:06:01.705 –> 00:06:03.925
of interest is in your institution
127
00:06:04.585 –> 00:06:07.645
and how that relates to actual uptake
128
00:06:08.185 –> 00:06:09.725
in your institution.
129
00:06:14.235 –> 00:06:17.635
Brilliant. I can see you are in there and voting already,
130
00:06:26.745 –> 00:06:30.005
and hopefully I’m gonna be able to then work out how
131
00:06:30.005 –> 00:06:32.165
to share the results of those polls
132
00:06:32.835 –> 00:06:34.285
once you’ve finished voting.
133
00:06:38.155 –> 00:06:40.175
How many people do we have in the room at the moment?
134
00:06:45.445 –> 00:06:48.155
We’ve got, um, 34.
135
00:06:48.945 –> 00:06:51.635
Fantastic. Okay. So we’ve got a few more. I
136
00:06:51.635 –> 00:06:53.355
Think 30 actually, Rebecca,
137
00:06:53.355 –> 00:06:54.675
because there’s four of us. There’s
138
00:06:54.675 –> 00:06:55.675
Four of us. Brilliant.
139
00:06:55.675 –> 00:06:57.835
So few more, few more votes to go yet.
140
00:06:58.135 –> 00:07:00.995
Has everybody managed to get into that, uh,
141
00:07:00.995 –> 00:07:01.995
into those polls?
142
00:07:08.265 –> 00:07:11.595
Same, but just, um, a comment from Sarah
143
00:07:11.855 –> 00:07:14.235
and I can see the same, so I can see comments,
144
00:07:14.455 –> 00:07:15.635
but I can’t see the voting.
145
00:07:16.575 –> 00:07:20.955
Um, no, I’m, I’m, I’m having a similar problem myself.
146
00:07:21.535 –> 00:07:25.675
Let me just see if I can, um, remember what I did
147
00:07:25.695 –> 00:07:29.875
to actually show the
148
00:07:29.875 –> 00:07:30.915
results of that.
149
00:07:34.525 –> 00:07:38.665
Oh, sorry. Take my vote away. Yeah. Right. Okay.
150
00:07:38.665 –> 00:07:40.905
Well, that’s really interesting
151
00:07:41.445 –> 00:07:43.145
and I will have to, um,
152
00:07:43.175 –> 00:07:45.705
perhaps think once we’ve got a few more votes in,
153
00:07:45.945 –> 00:07:48.345
I will work out how we share those votes perhaps a bit later
154
00:07:48.345 –> 00:07:51.465
on when you’re in the breakout room so we can find out, uh,
155
00:07:51.575 –> 00:07:52.625
what the results are.
156
00:07:52.835 –> 00:07:55.825
Sorry, that’s a bit of a a, a not great start, isn’t it?
157
00:07:55.895 –> 00:07:58.905
Alright, don’t worry. Um, we, we will, we will suss that.
158
00:07:58.945 –> 00:08:01.625
I thought I was being so clever there using a Padlet poll.
159
00:08:02.575 –> 00:08:05.625
Okay. If you haven’t voted yet, please do so.
160
00:08:05.685 –> 00:08:07.905
And then, then, as I say, I will try to work out
161
00:08:07.905 –> 00:08:09.945
what the results of that, those polls are
162
00:08:10.205 –> 00:08:13.065
and be able to show you that a bit later in the session.
163
00:08:16.045 –> 00:08:19.465
So, um, in terms of what we found here at the University
164
00:08:19.465 –> 00:08:21.145
of Sheffield, most
165
00:08:21.685 –> 00:08:24.625
of the postdoc respondents were at least partly interested
166
00:08:25.085 –> 00:08:27.865
in, um, in engaging in this kind
167
00:08:27.865 –> 00:08:29.865
of non-academic career development activity.
168
00:08:30.445 –> 00:08:33.105
So I don’t think we got any zeros at all.
169
00:08:33.485 –> 00:08:35.825
Uh, and as you can see there, the, the kind of, uh,
170
00:08:36.085 –> 00:08:39.585
people were going somewhere between yes, if it’s convenient,
171
00:08:39.845 –> 00:08:43.785
and I’m fairly interested, um, up towards, you know, even
172
00:08:44.585 –> 00:08:46.745
veering towards being very interested
173
00:08:47.325 –> 00:08:48.705
in terms of the levels of interest.
174
00:08:48.805 –> 00:08:51.305
So that was kind of confirming
175
00:08:51.535 –> 00:08:56.085
what we thought we knew anecdotally, uh, which was useful.
176
00:08:58.705 –> 00:09:00.325
We then asked both PIs
177
00:09:00.345 –> 00:09:04.005
and postdocs how much time they thought was available
178
00:09:04.705 –> 00:09:05.805
for career development,
179
00:09:06.305 –> 00:09:08.845
and interestingly, they both came up with a very similar,
180
00:09:09.465 –> 00:09:10.605
um, finding
181
00:09:10.605 –> 00:09:14.285
that they thought about a day a month was doable.
182
00:09:14.785 –> 00:09:18.045
Uh, PIs were actually slightly more generous in terms of
183
00:09:18.045 –> 00:09:19.605
what they thought was available, but it was a,
184
00:09:19.605 –> 00:09:20.605
it was a small difference.
185
00:09:21.145 –> 00:09:23.965
Um, but it was great to know that actually there was,
186
00:09:23.965 –> 00:09:25.285
there was common ground in terms
187
00:09:25.285 –> 00:09:29.605
of thinking at least theoretically nominally what type
188
00:09:29.605 –> 00:09:33.725
of availability there should be for undertaking, uh,
189
00:09:33.725 –> 00:09:35.405
career development activities.
190
00:09:35.745 –> 00:09:39.885
Um, for, for postdocs yet,
191
00:09:40.595 –> 00:09:42.125
when we came to ask them, well,
192
00:09:42.125 –> 00:09:43.805
how many are you actually using?
193
00:09:44.505 –> 00:09:46.525
Uh, the, the figures were quite different.
194
00:09:46.945 –> 00:09:50.085
And, um, here we were asking the, the,
195
00:09:50.085 –> 00:09:54.445
the graph on the left hand side shows, um, people
196
00:09:54.505 –> 00:09:58.045
who are using at least one day a year, uh,
197
00:09:58.185 –> 00:10:01.645
and worryingly, that’s actually fairly low down.
198
00:10:01.665 –> 00:10:05.285
We split this a, a, a across the, uh, different lengths
199
00:10:05.285 –> 00:10:08.085
of time that people have been in postdoc posts at the
200
00:10:08.085 –> 00:10:09.245
University of Sheffield.
201
00:10:09.825 –> 00:10:13.045
Um, and, and there’s a bit of variation there.
202
00:10:13.225 –> 00:10:17.085
As you can see, uh, that figure of less of one
203
00:10:17.085 –> 00:10:18.605
to two years is really interesting
204
00:10:18.605 –> 00:10:21.445
because they crop up as a bit
205
00:10:21.445 –> 00:10:23.525
of an outlier group in almost all
206
00:10:23.525 –> 00:10:25.125
of the findings across the survey,
207
00:10:25.125 –> 00:10:27.685
which has made us ask some really interesting questions
208
00:10:27.685 –> 00:10:31.525
about what was going on around that time, uh, and, and,
209
00:10:31.545 –> 00:10:33.405
and other, what reasons might there be for
210
00:10:33.405 –> 00:10:36.685
that particularly poor, uh, response in terms
211
00:10:36.685 –> 00:10:39.565
of those people, um, who, who’ve been here
212
00:10:39.675 –> 00:10:41.245
between a year and two years.
213
00:10:42.225 –> 00:10:43.805
But that’s obviously kind of not,
214
00:10:44.115 –> 00:10:47.725
doesn’t match up in any way, uh, to the,
215
00:10:47.745 –> 00:10:49.885
the enthusiasm expressed earlier.
216
00:10:51.085 –> 00:10:53.085
Interesting, if we look at the right hand graph there,
217
00:10:53.085 –> 00:10:57.645
that PIs felt that more time was being used,
218
00:10:58.345 –> 00:11:00.925
uh, by their postdocs than the postdocs
219
00:11:00.925 –> 00:11:02.925
themselves believed was the case.
220
00:11:03.545 –> 00:11:06.125
And again, there’s some interesting splits across faculties
221
00:11:06.145 –> 00:11:09.805
in terms of those, um, differences in perception,
222
00:11:09.825 –> 00:11:11.205
but I won’t show those here.
223
00:11:11.945 –> 00:11:16.005
Um, so again, really interesting questions there
224
00:11:16.005 –> 00:11:18.685
for us about, well, actually, what,
225
00:11:18.685 –> 00:11:21.405
what’s causing this difference in perception?
226
00:11:21.545 –> 00:11:25.605
Our postdocs being, uh, PIs being overly optimistic in terms
227
00:11:25.605 –> 00:11:27.645
of thinking about what’s being used,
228
00:11:27.645 –> 00:11:29.765
but also, are we counting the same thing here?
229
00:11:29.765 –> 00:11:31.005
What do we actually mean?
230
00:11:31.025 –> 00:11:34.165
And, and again, we had a fairly vague questions here,
231
00:11:34.185 –> 00:11:36.285
so perhaps this is about survey design,
232
00:11:36.305 –> 00:11:41.005
but I think there are, there are wider concerns here, uh,
233
00:11:41.005 –> 00:11:43.165
that we are, we’re currently trying to work through in terms
234
00:11:43.165 –> 00:11:45.125
of, well, what, what actually is meant
235
00:11:45.145 –> 00:11:46.605
by career development activity
236
00:11:46.625 –> 00:11:48.525
and what, what was meant more specifically
237
00:11:48.545 –> 00:11:51.565
by non-academic career development activity.
238
00:11:53.955 –> 00:11:55.565
Okay. Another brainstorm this time,
239
00:11:55.565 –> 00:11:56.925
we don’t need any results from this,
240
00:11:56.985 –> 00:12:00.405
but again, if you could go into the, uh, Padlet
241
00:12:00.865 –> 00:12:03.845
and let me know what you think
242
00:12:04.385 –> 00:12:06.165
the barriers are at your institution.
243
00:12:06.165 –> 00:12:08.205
What are you aware of that might be reasons from,
244
00:12:08.205 –> 00:12:12.085
from your institutional perspective, um, that,
245
00:12:12.085 –> 00:12:15.645
that might be stopping postdocs, carrying out the type
246
00:12:15.645 –> 00:12:19.165
of activities that they say that they’re interested in.
247
00:12:19.945 –> 00:12:23.685
Um, so if you could log into that please, James
248
00:12:23.825 –> 00:12:26.565
or Kerry, if you could pop the, the link into the chat bar
249
00:12:26.565 –> 00:12:27.685
as well, that would be really great.
250
00:12:27.775 –> 00:12:28.245
Thank you.
251
00:12:34.665 –> 00:12:38.665
Thank you. And we’ve, we’ve got a comment in there
252
00:12:38.665 –> 00:12:39.785
and some more people joining.
253
00:12:50.895 –> 00:12:53.465
Okay. Too busy on their own projects.
254
00:12:55.855 –> 00:12:58.345
Lack of community. Okay. That’s a really good point.
255
00:12:58.345 –> 00:13:00.825
Sharing, sharing the knowledge. How do you do this?
256
00:13:01.225 –> 00:13:04.485
Encouraging each other. Yeah.
257
00:13:05.785 –> 00:13:09.885
Uh, prioritization. Yeah. Time.
258
00:13:10.745 –> 00:13:11.165
Mm-hmm.
259
00:13:21.955 –> 00:13:26.125
Lack of support. Yeah. Focus, yeah.
260
00:13:26.255 –> 00:13:28.325
Value payoff of, of the, the activities
261
00:13:33.935 –> 00:13:35.195
and something it wasn’t good.
262
00:13:36.585 –> 00:13:40.875
Yeah. Agree with that one. Lack of confidence using time.
263
00:13:41.065 –> 00:13:44.685
Yeah. Some
264
00:13:44.685 –> 00:13:46.125
confusion about what counts.
265
00:13:46.155 –> 00:13:46.445
Yeah.
266
00:13:50.455 –> 00:13:51.245
Don’t think’s available.
267
00:13:51.605 –> 00:13:53.845
Suitable. Yeah. Fantastic.
268
00:13:54.115 –> 00:13:56.845
It’s, it’s good to know we’re not massive outliers here in
269
00:13:56.845 –> 00:13:58.885
terms of what we found, um,
270
00:13:59.265 –> 00:14:02.325
but that these are common themes
271
00:14:03.225 –> 00:14:05.805
across institutions didn’t know about it.
272
00:14:05.805 –> 00:14:09.685
Yeah. That trying to get information out, um,
273
00:14:10.305 –> 00:14:13.765
making sure people are aware of, of what there is, lack
274
00:14:13.765 –> 00:14:15.325
of time despite having support.
275
00:14:18.405 –> 00:14:20.525
Brilliant. Thank you. Keep, keep popping your,
276
00:14:20.525 –> 00:14:21.565
your thoughts on there.
277
00:14:22.425 –> 00:14:27.035
Um, lack of time, timeline
278
00:14:27.035 –> 00:14:28.915
to finish project too much enough, but not what they want.
279
00:14:29.055 –> 00:14:31.315
That’s a really interesting point as well.
280
00:14:32.065 –> 00:14:33.595
Lack of hope for good opportunities.
281
00:14:36.795 –> 00:14:41.155
Brilliant. Yeah.
282
00:14:41.415 –> 00:14:46.355
So those all look, uh, very much like
283
00:14:46.865 –> 00:14:48.355
what we were finding.
284
00:14:48.855 –> 00:14:49.075
Um,
285
00:14:58.395 –> 00:14:58.745
Great.
286
00:14:58.955 –> 00:15:00.985
Thank you all for, for adding to those do key pad.
287
00:15:00.985 –> 00:15:03.545
That’s a really interesting, um, list there
288
00:15:06.145 –> 00:15:08.845
to go back to the slides.
289
00:15:11.385 –> 00:15:13.125
Um, click the right button.
290
00:15:14.225 –> 00:15:17.805
Uh, these are just a few of the kind of real, um, comments
291
00:15:17.955 –> 00:15:20.405
that, that got us scratching our heads and,
292
00:15:20.505 –> 00:15:23.445
and, uh, feed into some of the other concerns
293
00:15:23.445 –> 00:15:26.125
that I’m gonna break down on, on on the next few slides.
294
00:15:26.985 –> 00:15:28.725
Um, and,
295
00:15:29.025 –> 00:15:31.965
and confirmed some of the messaging about things which,
296
00:15:31.975 –> 00:15:35.245
which we suspected were happening, but,
297
00:15:35.265 –> 00:15:36.445
but weren’t completely sure.
298
00:15:36.545 –> 00:15:40.415
So, um, that, that first one that I’ve been told
299
00:15:40.415 –> 00:15:43.295
to use annual leave for professional development activities,
300
00:15:44.285 –> 00:15:45.735
that was not a one-off.
301
00:15:45.955 –> 00:15:50.215
Uh, we heard a, a few other people, both PIs also saying
302
00:15:50.215 –> 00:15:52.095
that this was what, not they,
303
00:15:52.095 –> 00:15:54.255
but what they felt other PIs were saying.
304
00:15:54.915 –> 00:15:58.295
Um, so that was, that was a really interesting one for us
305
00:15:58.355 –> 00:16:00.775
and, and gave concern to us.
306
00:16:00.775 –> 00:16:02.415
And we’ll go through kind of in a bit
307
00:16:02.415 –> 00:16:03.495
more detail some of these things.
308
00:16:04.075 –> 00:16:06.335
Um, and these are the funder become
309
00:16:06.375 –> 00:16:09.735
before the needs of the postdoc in terms of development,
310
00:16:10.525 –> 00:16:13.455
clarity, lack of clarity in terms of funders
311
00:16:13.555 –> 00:16:16.255
and what they’re allowed to take or not allowed to take,
312
00:16:16.995 –> 00:16:18.415
and lack of discussion.
313
00:16:18.645 –> 00:16:20.055
What came up with one of your comments?
314
00:16:20.085 –> 00:16:21.095
Lack of afinity not knowing
315
00:16:21.095 –> 00:16:22.615
what other people are actually really doing.
316
00:16:23.165 –> 00:16:25.495
This idea that some people might be doing something,
317
00:16:25.835 –> 00:16:28.495
but we’re not really sure and nobody’s talking about it.
318
00:16:29.235 –> 00:16:33.255
Um, so I’ve broken these down, the barriers that came up in,
319
00:16:33.255 –> 00:16:36.615
in the feedback in terms of different, um, themes.
320
00:16:37.315 –> 00:16:39.255
And the first one there as, as several
321
00:16:39.255 –> 00:16:40.775
of you identified, is time.
322
00:16:41.515 –> 00:16:44.815
Um, just being able to keep your head above water
323
00:16:44.955 –> 00:16:48.535
as a postdoc is, is definitely a, a challenge
324
00:16:48.535 –> 00:16:49.735
that we’re all aware of.
325
00:16:50.315 –> 00:16:53.695
Um, and if one does have time, the focus is gonna be on,
326
00:16:53.695 –> 00:16:54.695
well, where’s my next job?
327
00:16:55.075 –> 00:16:57.655
Uh, you know, how am I gonna make the time to,
328
00:16:57.715 –> 00:16:58.815
to create the outputs
329
00:16:58.815 –> 00:17:00.135
and the CV that I’m going to need
330
00:17:00.135 –> 00:17:03.295
to be competitive when it comes to renew my contract?
331
00:17:03.595 –> 00:17:05.055
So that was a really important comment
332
00:17:05.055 –> 00:17:06.735
that came up in various guises.
333
00:17:07.315 –> 00:17:11.135
Um, yeah, and then maximizing output from the project again.
334
00:17:11.875 –> 00:17:15.895
And, um, the, the, the lead in time for setting up some
335
00:17:15.895 –> 00:17:18.255
of these opportunities was also something that came up
336
00:17:18.255 –> 00:17:19.815
with a few of our postdocs.
337
00:17:19.815 –> 00:17:22.655
So, you know, this person had only found out about it
338
00:17:22.655 –> 00:17:23.815
towards the end of their contract.
339
00:17:23.815 –> 00:17:25.975
Well, what can you do with three months when, again,
340
00:17:25.975 –> 00:17:28.455
firstly you’re gonna be focusing on what your next job is,
341
00:17:28.675 –> 00:17:31.175
but also, you know, setting up a, a piece
342
00:17:31.175 –> 00:17:33.175
of knowledge exchange or some consultancy work,
343
00:17:33.325 –> 00:17:35.495
it’s probably not going to fit into that timeframe.
344
00:17:35.915 –> 00:17:38.615
Uh, so that does kind of then feed into the idea of
345
00:17:39.405 –> 00:17:42.975
knowledge, which was, which was the next set of comments
346
00:17:43.525 –> 00:17:44.615
that we thought about.
347
00:17:45.275 –> 00:17:48.175
Um, so this, this was an interesting one from one
348
00:17:48.175 –> 00:17:50.485
of our postdocs who said, you know,
349
00:17:51.005 –> 00:17:54.125
I didn’t even know about it until my PI suggested it.
350
00:17:54.785 –> 00:17:55.965
Um, and,
351
00:17:56.025 –> 00:17:58.405
and even now, having done a secondment, this,
352
00:17:58.405 –> 00:18:00.725
this postdoc wasn’t really sure of how it worked.
353
00:18:00.725 –> 00:18:02.885
Fortunately, they had a PI who were able, who was able
354
00:18:02.885 –> 00:18:04.965
to steer them in the right direction
355
00:18:04.985 –> 00:18:06.405
and make sure that happened,
356
00:18:06.545 –> 00:18:09.645
but, uh, they wouldn’t be able to share the, the information
357
00:18:09.645 –> 00:18:11.645
with others because they really don’t know
358
00:18:12.115 –> 00:18:13.325
what that was about.
359
00:18:13.625 –> 00:18:14.765
But of mis knowledge,
360
00:18:14.765 –> 00:18:17.645
perhaps only academics can do consultancy.
361
00:18:17.645 –> 00:18:21.325
And we, we, we, we found this kind of misunderstanding,
362
00:18:21.325 –> 00:18:22.405
misperceptions or,
363
00:18:22.405 –> 00:18:26.325
or lack of clarity about, uh, what was actually available,
364
00:18:26.545 –> 00:18:30.645
who was eligible for, for some of the opportunities, um,
365
00:18:31.025 –> 00:18:34.045
was a reflection perhaps of lack of clarity in some
366
00:18:34.045 –> 00:18:37.805
of the central university documents, as well as those rumors
367
00:18:37.825 –> 00:18:39.485
or, or things that go around
368
00:18:39.545 –> 00:18:41.085
or how do we get information out.
369
00:18:41.085 –> 00:18:45.525
As well as I know from, from speaking to, um, people,
370
00:18:45.535 –> 00:18:48.605
colleagues in, in other institutions, the, the big challenge
371
00:18:48.625 –> 00:18:50.685
of of actually getting messages out
372
00:18:50.705 –> 00:18:53.885
and in, in a format which, which postdocs are likely
373
00:18:53.945 –> 00:18:55.685
to engage with and read is, is,
374
00:18:55.745 –> 00:18:57.685
is an ongoing challenge for many of us.
375
00:18:58.425 –> 00:19:00.805
Um, so yeah, lack of knowledge about the actual process,
376
00:19:00.955 –> 00:19:03.685
even if people do know that it’s, it’s aware.
377
00:19:03.705 –> 00:19:06.605
And again, we identified challenges with,
378
00:19:06.635 –> 00:19:08.245
with finding out about things.
379
00:19:08.785 –> 00:19:12.645
We actually have some amazing ke pages, large exchange pages
380
00:19:13.185 –> 00:19:15.125
on, uh, some of our university pages.
381
00:19:15.265 –> 00:19:18.685
But actually getting to the landing page to be able to, uh,
382
00:19:18.755 –> 00:19:19.885
find all that information
383
00:19:19.905 –> 00:19:22.085
and understand how the process works, even
384
00:19:22.105 –> 00:19:25.605
for internal people can be, uh, somewhat tricky.
385
00:19:26.815 –> 00:19:29.435
Um, yeah, so finding information
386
00:19:29.695 –> 00:19:31.675
and then the, the processes.
387
00:19:31.695 –> 00:19:33.275
So even if we find the information,
388
00:19:33.275 –> 00:19:34.635
does it actually apply to me?
389
00:19:34.995 –> 00:19:36.515
I know some people are doing consultancy,
390
00:19:36.575 –> 00:19:38.755
but you know, how did they arrange that?
391
00:19:38.855 –> 00:19:41.475
Who do I talk to if I’m interested in doing it?
392
00:19:41.815 –> 00:19:43.715
What’s the process for setting it up?
393
00:19:44.135 –> 00:19:47.275
So again, that was some really useful, uh, feedback
394
00:19:47.275 –> 00:19:50.035
for us in terms of, you know, suggesting concrete things
395
00:19:50.035 –> 00:19:52.595
that, that we can start to act on to,
396
00:19:52.735 –> 00:19:56.155
to improve the knowledge part of, uh, that kind
397
00:19:56.155 –> 00:19:58.635
of misperception or lack of information.
398
00:20:00.335 –> 00:20:02.875
The next thing that came up was one of confidence.
399
00:20:03.495 –> 00:20:06.715
If you are a junior ECR, that kind of power dynamic
400
00:20:06.985 –> 00:20:09.555
with your pi, are you able to go to them
401
00:20:09.615 –> 00:20:12.355
and say, uh, well actually I’d really love
402
00:20:12.355 –> 00:20:14.315
to do this bit of external work.
403
00:20:14.335 –> 00:20:15.675
Is that okay with you?
404
00:20:16.135 –> 00:20:18.035
Or do you feel that that has to be raised
405
00:20:18.415 –> 00:20:19.715
by the PI themselves?
406
00:20:19.855 –> 00:20:21.395
You feel it’s perhaps, uh,
407
00:20:21.395 –> 00:20:23.315
something you can’t have at the beginning
408
00:20:23.375 –> 00:20:25.315
of your career you need to work towards?
409
00:20:25.575 –> 00:20:27.475
You may not feel that you’ve actually got the skills
410
00:20:27.575 –> 00:20:28.875
to go out and, and offer.
411
00:20:29.695 –> 00:20:32.075
Um, that idea of, particularly from arts
412
00:20:32.075 –> 00:20:34.435
and humanities researchers as it was voiced.
413
00:20:34.695 –> 00:20:37.395
You know, if, if, if the government doesn’t really care
414
00:20:37.395 –> 00:20:38.635
about arts humanities,
415
00:20:38.935 –> 00:20:40.515
why would industry want to hear from us?
416
00:20:40.515 –> 00:20:42.115
What, what, what do we have to offer?
417
00:20:43.095 –> 00:20:46.475
Um, and then this kind of, the, this,
418
00:20:46.475 –> 00:20:50.005
this was a comment actually by, um, somebody
419
00:20:50.005 –> 00:20:53.845
who is a PI themselves that, that they see, uh, engagement
420
00:20:53.865 –> 00:20:58.835
as being good, where PIs are actively encouraging that.
421
00:20:59.495 –> 00:21:00.755
And of course, those people
422
00:21:00.855 –> 00:21:04.315
who are in a more comfortable funding position, uh,
423
00:21:04.315 –> 00:21:06.875
versus those who are a bit, you know,
424
00:21:06.875 –> 00:21:07.875
perhaps doing part-time
425
00:21:07.895 –> 00:21:11.555
or multiple part-time, uh, contracts, uh,
426
00:21:11.695 –> 00:21:14.075
are are obviously struggling a bit more and, and,
427
00:21:14.695 –> 00:21:16.915
and struggling to be encouraged to do that.
428
00:21:17.615 –> 00:21:19.435
So that was a, a third barrier that
429
00:21:19.545 –> 00:21:23.795
that came outta the feedback, uh, particularly from
430
00:21:24.315 –> 00:21:25.435
postdocs themselves.
431
00:21:27.315 –> 00:21:29.765
Another comment that relates to one of the, the,
432
00:21:29.825 –> 00:21:32.285
the comments in the, uh, on,
433
00:21:32.305 –> 00:21:34.925
on the Padlet there is this idea of, well,
434
00:21:34.945 –> 00:21:37.045
is this actually gonna be useful for me?
435
00:21:37.705 –> 00:21:42.605
Um, some postdocs voiced this concern that actually
436
00:21:42.625 –> 00:21:43.685
for certain kinds of work,
437
00:21:43.685 –> 00:21:46.685
and this was, this was mostly arts, human social sciences,
438
00:21:47.015 –> 00:21:50.685
where your work is perhaps a little bit more open to being
439
00:21:51.405 –> 00:21:52.885
misconstrued or,
440
00:21:53.185 –> 00:21:56.845
or twisted at, at least from a perception.
441
00:21:57.385 –> 00:22:00.205
Um, people are concerned that if they do speak out,
442
00:22:00.265 –> 00:22:04.125
if they do engage, uh, that they could be misrepresented
443
00:22:04.225 –> 00:22:06.645
and that could then have an impact on their standing,
444
00:22:06.655 –> 00:22:09.925
their credibility as a researcher, as an academic.
445
00:22:10.665 –> 00:22:14.445
Um, I was concerned that actually if you start to engage,
446
00:22:14.545 –> 00:22:16.565
you are, you’re on a one way track,
447
00:22:16.585 –> 00:22:19.445
and your pi will, will firstly see you
448
00:22:19.445 –> 00:22:22.365
as not being interested in academic career anymore.
449
00:22:22.745 –> 00:22:26.885
Uh, but also, uh, you, you may not get back, uh, which
450
00:22:26.885 –> 00:22:28.405
of course contrasts in this comment.
451
00:22:28.505 –> 00:22:29.885
The second comment there with the fact
452
00:22:29.885 –> 00:22:33.125
that actually those people who do this engagement, uh,
453
00:22:33.355 –> 00:22:36.125
come back with, with some really valuable skills
454
00:22:36.145 –> 00:22:38.045
and connections, which will serve them,
455
00:22:38.155 –> 00:22:40.885
whether they go into industry eventually
456
00:22:40.945 –> 00:22:45.745
or they stay in their academic, um, pathway, um,
457
00:22:46.565 –> 00:22:47.945
and this idea
458
00:22:47.945 –> 00:22:50.585
that actually people aren’t seeing the opportunity
459
00:22:50.655 –> 00:22:54.345
that presents themselves because they are so focused.
460
00:22:54.445 –> 00:22:57.425
And we have this also with the comments on time on just
461
00:22:58.005 –> 00:23:01.345
making the next academic step happen
462
00:23:01.445 –> 00:23:03.305
and all the work that goes into that.
463
00:23:03.405 –> 00:23:05.945
It, it’s, it’s hard, you know, it’s then hard
464
00:23:05.945 –> 00:23:09.865
to recognize the value of those external opportunities.
465
00:23:10.245 –> 00:23:13.545
And, and as we, we always say, both for an academic career
466
00:23:13.645 –> 00:23:18.465
and for a potential, uh, pathway out of academia, uh, it,
467
00:23:18.535 –> 00:23:20.585
it’s never kind of only in one direction,
468
00:23:23.885 –> 00:23:27.705
the final kind of real set of barriers, uh, identified, uh,
469
00:23:27.845 –> 00:23:32.185
by postdocs as to why they’re not taking up, uh, these,
470
00:23:32.195 –> 00:23:34.385
these kind of external opportunities.
471
00:23:35.325 –> 00:23:38.585
Uh, um, again, this is something that we hear again
472
00:23:38.585 –> 00:23:40.705
and again, this kind of, if you’ve got any kind
473
00:23:40.705 –> 00:23:43.785
of life obligations, caring responsibilities, whether
474
00:23:43.785 –> 00:23:45.065
that’s children, older people,
475
00:23:45.745 –> 00:23:49.085
or anything in between, uh, it, it’s a massive challenge
476
00:23:49.085 –> 00:23:51.485
because you are already trying to squeeze the most out
477
00:23:51.485 –> 00:23:53.125
of a very limited number of hours.
478
00:23:53.785 –> 00:23:55.965
So something that feels like it’s extra
479
00:23:55.985 –> 00:23:59.765
or it’s optional, just doesn’t get any kind of attention.
480
00:24:00.505 –> 00:24:01.765
Um, and that can come
481
00:24:01.765 –> 00:24:04.365
that we had coming up in various guises was
482
00:24:04.365 –> 00:24:08.285
that actually these days need to be, uh, both paid for
483
00:24:08.385 –> 00:24:11.325
and put in the contract, put in writing that they exist
484
00:24:11.865 –> 00:24:16.365
in order to be able to, um, to, to kind
485
00:24:16.365 –> 00:24:19.645
of justify spending your time on doing career
486
00:24:19.645 –> 00:24:20.725
development activities.
487
00:24:21.425 –> 00:24:24.645
And that second quote there also mentions child cancer on,
488
00:24:24.645 –> 00:24:27.885
but I thought brought another really interesting, uh,
489
00:24:27.915 –> 00:24:30.085
challenge up, and that’s the, the position
490
00:24:30.265 –> 00:24:33.805
of our international researchers of whom we have a, a good
491
00:24:34.365 –> 00:24:35.605
proportion here in Sheffield.
492
00:24:35.825 –> 00:24:38.405
You know, you’ve not only got all of those things to juggle,
493
00:24:38.705 –> 00:24:40.365
but you’ve then also got, well,
494
00:24:40.445 –> 00:24:42.565
what is the visa requirement changing?
495
00:24:42.665 –> 00:24:44.645
How does this affect me? How does this affect my family?
496
00:24:44.905 –> 00:24:47.605
How does this affect any payments I might additionally need
497
00:24:47.605 –> 00:24:49.205
to, to come up with?
498
00:24:49.505 –> 00:24:50.525
You know, how does the,
499
00:24:50.525 –> 00:24:54.085
the potential gap in contracts then affect me in terms
500
00:24:54.105 –> 00:24:55.565
of my visa situation?
501
00:24:55.985 –> 00:24:58.125
So those things that, that they’re really kind of
502
00:24:59.495 –> 00:25:03.275
big massive challenges, uh, in, in terms of being able
503
00:25:03.275 –> 00:25:07.355
to help postdocs to, to actually take these opportunities
504
00:25:07.465 –> 00:25:09.595
that they have expressed an interest in.
505
00:25:12.325 –> 00:25:16.065
So one of the, the comments that came up in the, uh, Padlet,
506
00:25:16.485 –> 00:25:20.185
uh, that you, uh, nicely wrote was, was this idea
507
00:25:20.185 –> 00:25:22.745
of the lack of support or encouragement from PIs.
508
00:25:22.745 –> 00:25:24.745
And that was certainly something, uh,
509
00:25:25.015 –> 00:25:26.585
that, that was mentioned.
510
00:25:27.285 –> 00:25:31.225
Um, so one of the questions we asked p postdocs was,
511
00:25:31.285 –> 00:25:35.345
do you think your pi uh, is supportive of you, uh,
512
00:25:35.345 –> 00:25:36.985
taking career development activity,
513
00:25:37.105 –> 00:25:40.345
particularly in this kind of, in, in the, the areas
514
00:25:40.345 –> 00:25:43.305
that we were focusing on, knowledge exchange, consultancy
515
00:25:43.885 –> 00:25:45.385
and, uh, secondment.
516
00:25:46.245 –> 00:25:50.705
And generally there was quite a mixed response here, uh, as
517
00:25:50.705 –> 00:25:52.385
to whether people think their post, their,
518
00:25:52.385 –> 00:25:53.665
their PIs are supportive.
519
00:25:54.365 –> 00:25:59.065
Uh, so there was a sense that yes,
520
00:25:59.655 –> 00:26:02.985
generally speaking, as long as there is some kind of a plan
521
00:26:03.365 –> 00:26:04.985
or there’s a, you know, you know,
522
00:26:05.805 –> 00:26:08.425
the postdocs themselves are being really enthusiastic about
523
00:26:08.425 –> 00:26:13.025
things, uh, we, there, there does seem to be support for it.
524
00:26:13.165 –> 00:26:16.185
Notice again, that really interesting slump in terms
525
00:26:16.185 –> 00:26:19.545
of those people who’ve been here from one to two years, uh,
526
00:26:19.605 –> 00:26:22.385
as we had in the previous, um, chart.
527
00:26:22.925 –> 00:26:26.585
So generally speaking, people seem to think
528
00:26:26.585 –> 00:26:28.385
that their PIs are supportive
529
00:26:28.845 –> 00:26:30.665
of their career development activity.
530
00:26:31.605 –> 00:26:34.905
The PIs themselves, when we asked were, were also, uh,
531
00:26:35.315 –> 00:26:38.065
expressing similar levels of, of interest
532
00:26:38.125 –> 00:26:39.305
and, and general support.
533
00:26:39.325 –> 00:26:41.385
So across the board, this was really encouraging.
534
00:26:41.455 –> 00:26:44.125
Both PIs and postdocs think that, that they,
535
00:26:44.425 –> 00:26:49.085
the PIs will be supportive, um, of this kind of activity.
536
00:26:49.825 –> 00:26:54.085
Um, and yet interestingly, um,
537
00:26:55.525 –> 00:26:58.805
postdocs may not actually be testing that out.
538
00:26:58.805 –> 00:27:00.525
They, they’re working on hunches here.
539
00:27:00.545 –> 00:27:02.565
So for example, those who are put off
540
00:27:02.565 –> 00:27:06.565
because they feel that their PIs may not be supportive
541
00:27:06.565 –> 00:27:10.725
of such activity in some cases haven’t ever actually, uh,
542
00:27:10.725 –> 00:27:12.445
spoken to their PIs about this.
543
00:27:13.145 –> 00:27:16.965
Um, and really interesting, um, data that came up there
544
00:27:16.965 –> 00:27:19.205
with very much the same levels being reported.
545
00:27:19.425 –> 00:27:21.805
So almost a quarter of our, uh,
546
00:27:21.835 –> 00:27:24.725
respondents said they’d never discussed career development
547
00:27:24.725 –> 00:27:26.205
activities with their pi.
548
00:27:26.825 –> 00:27:29.725
And that really nicely matched that idea of, of, of
549
00:27:30.475 –> 00:27:34.005
just over three quarters of PIs saying that they raised
550
00:27:34.925 –> 00:27:37.045
specifically key activity, uh,
551
00:27:37.045 –> 00:27:39.645
but that they raised these topics in conversations
552
00:27:39.675 –> 00:27:42.885
with their, sorry, FTRS, I forgot to change that there.
553
00:27:42.885 –> 00:27:44.365
That should be postdocs.
554
00:27:45.185 –> 00:27:47.885
Um, so, so that was really interesting to know
555
00:27:47.885 –> 00:27:49.365
that people are concerned about this
556
00:27:49.625 –> 00:27:52.925
and perhaps their concerns are being fueled by,
557
00:27:53.925 –> 00:27:56.645
I won’t say rumors, but by conversations that are going on
558
00:27:56.645 –> 00:27:59.325
around them, which may reflect the real situation
559
00:27:59.325 –> 00:28:01.045
of other postdocs who,
560
00:28:01.045 –> 00:28:03.125
whose line managers may be less supportive
561
00:28:03.305 –> 00:28:06.005
but aren’t necessarily reflective of the situation
562
00:28:06.005 –> 00:28:08.005
of their own line managers.
563
00:28:08.105 –> 00:28:10.805
So, so this prompted a lot of thinking for us about, well,
564
00:28:10.805 –> 00:28:14.365
how do we make sure these things are routinely
565
00:28:14.995 –> 00:28:19.125
discussed in a way that takes the, uh, the worry out of it,
566
00:28:19.665 –> 00:28:21.965
uh, for, for postdocs who want to
567
00:28:22.555 –> 00:28:24.645
explore career development activities, but
568
00:28:24.665 –> 00:28:26.765
but may be concerned that that raising it
569
00:28:26.765 –> 00:28:28.645
with their PI gets a negative response,
570
00:28:29.545 –> 00:28:31.045
um, on, on that thing.
571
00:28:31.185 –> 00:28:35.925
So thinking then about what, identify what barriers
572
00:28:36.665 –> 00:28:39.165
PIs were identifying in the survey, and,
573
00:28:39.225 –> 00:28:42.245
and again, I don’t, this would be a surprise to anybody
574
00:28:42.315 –> 00:28:46.245
that time, particularly where people are on, um, you know,
575
00:28:46.245 –> 00:28:50.405
these grant, grant, uh, funded projects,
576
00:28:50.405 –> 00:28:53.805
which specify a hundred percent of the postdoc time
577
00:28:54.225 –> 00:28:58.365
as being, uh, dedicated to working on that project.
578
00:29:00.585 –> 00:29:04.125
So there were some interesting responses
579
00:29:04.125 –> 00:29:06.805
and further responses where PIs were saying just, well,
580
00:29:06.805 –> 00:29:08.805
of course there isn’t time, but then there isn’t time
581
00:29:08.805 –> 00:29:11.005
for half of the academic research that we do.
582
00:29:11.425 –> 00:29:12.885
You know, theoretically on a piece
583
00:29:12.885 –> 00:29:14.045
of paper it says this time,
584
00:29:14.045 –> 00:29:15.565
but we know most of us end up doing
585
00:29:15.565 –> 00:29:17.925
that in our evenings, in our weekends.
586
00:29:18.505 –> 00:29:21.845
We create the time that we need, uh, in order to do this.
587
00:29:22.425 –> 00:29:27.045
So that was was, was also a, a response that came up.
588
00:29:27.585 –> 00:29:31.085
Um, but there was, uh, there were a number
589
00:29:31.085 –> 00:29:33.245
of people concerned about available time,
590
00:29:33.335 –> 00:29:35.485
about costing models, um,
591
00:29:35.785 –> 00:29:37.245
and about, uh, this,
592
00:29:37.365 –> 00:29:39.365
I thought this was an interesting comment here about the
593
00:29:39.365 –> 00:29:40.925
fact that actually because we asked people
594
00:29:41.120 –> 00:29:45.485
to do other mandatory training that also is being counted
595
00:29:45.825 –> 00:29:47.085
as career development.
596
00:29:47.085 –> 00:29:48.845
And we might argue, again, is
597
00:29:48.845 –> 00:29:50.685
that actually career development time?
598
00:29:50.945 –> 00:29:52.165
But from a PI perspective,
599
00:29:52.225 –> 00:29:53.925
if we don’t do it in career development time
600
00:29:53.925 –> 00:29:57.325
and there’s no time, uh, allocated in, in, in the funding,
601
00:29:58.745 –> 00:30:00.245
how do they do that other training?
602
00:30:00.905 –> 00:30:03.725
So, um, so some really interesting
603
00:30:04.425 –> 00:30:07.765
if not surprising responses there from, from PAs about,
604
00:30:07.765 –> 00:30:09.325
well, look, I’d, I’d love to support this.
605
00:30:09.995 –> 00:30:11.845
There’s no time to do it in the contract.
606
00:30:11.845 –> 00:30:13.845
We’ve already got a full contract of work to do.
607
00:30:16.145 –> 00:30:19.525
Um, but also of interest, lack of institutional support.
608
00:30:19.745 –> 00:30:22.965
So, uh, lack of kind of details.
609
00:30:23.225 –> 00:30:26.925
How do I help my, my postdocs do this if they want to, uh,
610
00:30:27.085 –> 00:30:29.525
comments on lack of being able to find out the paperwork,
611
00:30:29.715 –> 00:30:32.685
find the paperwork to be able to do this, um,
612
00:30:34.965 –> 00:30:38.725
postdocs not being able to be paid misunderstandings about
613
00:30:38.785 –> 00:30:39.885
how that actually works.
614
00:30:40.025 –> 00:30:43.165
If they’re doing some kind of consultancy, again,
615
00:30:43.165 –> 00:30:45.125
from a central perspective, we might say, oh yeah,
616
00:30:45.125 –> 00:30:46.405
but the details are out there.
617
00:30:46.745 –> 00:30:49.885
It doesn’t matter if PIs aren’t able to find them
618
00:30:49.885 –> 00:30:50.885
and postdocs can’t find them,
619
00:30:50.885 –> 00:30:53.565
and together they can’t actually make the case for doing
620
00:30:53.995 –> 00:30:55.045
that kind of work.
621
00:30:55.545 –> 00:31:00.365
Uh, and then the lack of funding to, to cover, um, activity,
622
00:31:00.495 –> 00:31:05.125
which needs to be backfilled if, uh, postdocs are going
623
00:31:05.125 –> 00:31:08.005
to be going off and doing things in, in what’s seen
624
00:31:08.005 –> 00:31:10.685
as their kind of core, uh, contracted hours.
625
00:31:11.105 –> 00:31:14.685
Uh, that’s the perspective of, of, of some PIs at least.
626
00:31:15.145 –> 00:31:16.565
And that came up several times.
627
00:31:16.865 –> 00:31:20.925
So the institution might say that it wants postdocs
628
00:31:20.925 –> 00:31:22.405
to do this, and it wants PIs
629
00:31:22.405 –> 00:31:24.965
to support their postdocs in taking on this kind
630
00:31:24.965 –> 00:31:26.525
of career development activity,
631
00:31:26.945 –> 00:31:29.445
but the practical support needs to be better, uh,
632
00:31:29.445 –> 00:31:30.565
to make this possible.
633
00:31:32.705 –> 00:31:35.845
And then as we’ve, we’ve already mentioned this idea of
634
00:31:35.915 –> 00:31:38.685
what, what do we mean by career development activities?
635
00:31:39.545 –> 00:31:41.765
Um, you know, and, and,
636
00:31:41.785 –> 00:31:44.885
and what counts, uh, in, in that space.
637
00:31:45.065 –> 00:31:48.925
Is it only, you know, formal ke or consultancy work or,
638
00:31:49.305 –> 00:31:52.805
or could we count, um, other things such as engagement
639
00:31:52.805 –> 00:31:55.725
with community groups, if that works in terms
640
00:31:55.725 –> 00:31:57.805
of your research interests and your search profile.
641
00:31:58.385 –> 00:32:01.645
Um, but it’s not one of those university sanctioned things.
642
00:32:01.645 –> 00:32:02.925
So it’s a, what do we actually,
643
00:32:03.155 –> 00:32:04.805
what are we actually talking about here?
644
00:32:05.465 –> 00:32:10.285
Um, but also, uh, really interesting comment here about,
645
00:32:10.285 –> 00:32:14.685
well, actually our whole setup is still kind of, um,
646
00:32:16.535 –> 00:32:20.165
gravitates towards preparing people for career development
647
00:32:20.425 –> 00:32:22.445
for an academic career, uh,
648
00:32:22.445 –> 00:32:24.165
which I thought was an interesting comment given we were
649
00:32:24.405 –> 00:32:27.445
specifically asking about non-academic, uh,
650
00:32:27.695 –> 00:32:29.685
engagement forms here.
651
00:32:30.105 –> 00:32:34.165
Uh, but still a PI saying, well, you know, actually we,
652
00:32:34.265 –> 00:32:38.605
we do cater too much for, for those kind of who only want
653
00:32:38.605 –> 00:32:41.245
to stay in an academic pathway, even though we know
654
00:32:41.555 –> 00:32:43.725
that there are many people, many researchers
655
00:32:43.905 –> 00:32:46.885
who either don’t want to continue in that pathway
656
00:32:47.225 –> 00:32:51.165
or life will show that they do not continue in that pathway
657
00:32:51.465 –> 00:32:52.605
for, for for many reasons.
658
00:32:56.285 –> 00:32:58.615
Okay. So that you’ve heard a lot from me.
659
00:32:58.915 –> 00:33:01.815
Um, what I’m going to do now is to ask you if you can,
660
00:33:01.835 –> 00:33:03.215
to go into a breakout group.
661
00:33:03.395 –> 00:33:06.095
If you can’t join a breakout group for technical reasons
662
00:33:06.235 –> 00:33:09.695
or location reasons, please do stay in the main group
663
00:33:09.755 –> 00:33:12.495
and we’ll try and have a bit of a chat there, um, either
664
00:33:12.495 –> 00:33:15.255
with Mike’s or through the chat bar if I can find it.
665
00:33:15.715 –> 00:33:18.455
Uh, but I’d like you to go into rooms if you could please,
666
00:33:18.995 –> 00:33:21.415
if you’ve got a camera or you could do a screenshot just
667
00:33:21.415 –> 00:33:22.535
to capture those questions.
668
00:33:22.535 –> 00:33:25.895
They’re gonna ask you to think about those two questions,
669
00:33:25.955 –> 00:33:28.455
please, in each, um, breakout room.
670
00:33:28.455 –> 00:33:30.415
Firstly, what’s the good practice that you’re aware
671
00:33:30.415 –> 00:33:32.015
of might be in your institution
672
00:33:32.355 –> 00:33:36.095
or it might be elsewhere, in terms of supporting this kind
673
00:33:36.095 –> 00:33:39.095
of career development activity, uh, particularly
674
00:33:39.095 –> 00:33:41.175
where it’s engaging with organizations
675
00:33:41.285 –> 00:33:42.975
outside the academic world,
676
00:33:43.715 –> 00:33:46.935
and is there an action, you know, having listened to some
677
00:33:46.935 –> 00:33:48.695
of the things that we’ve been talking about today
678
00:33:48.885 –> 00:33:52.415
that you think your institution should, uh, take
679
00:33:52.875 –> 00:33:54.295
to increase activity.
680
00:33:54.515 –> 00:33:56.295
So those two comments, please.
681
00:33:56.785 –> 00:34:00.855
Kerry is going to marvelously arrange you into breakout
682
00:34:00.855 –> 00:34:04.975
groups, and hopefully you’ll be invited to join one shortly.
683
00:34:05.715 –> 00:34:09.195
Uh, great.
684
00:34:09.195 –> 00:34:10.995
It seems that most people are back in now.
685
00:34:11.615 –> 00:34:13.955
Um, so what I’m really keen
686
00:34:13.975 –> 00:34:15.955
to hear about is whether you managed
687
00:34:15.955 –> 00:34:18.995
to identify good practice that you, uh,
688
00:34:19.105 –> 00:34:21.475
know about either in your institution or elsewhere.
689
00:34:22.095 –> 00:34:24.595
Um, if you had something that was,
690
00:34:24.655 –> 00:34:25.755
was discussed in your group,
691
00:34:25.755 –> 00:34:27.315
would somebody from your group like
692
00:34:27.315 –> 00:34:30.635
to pop it in the chat bar so that we can all see, uh,
693
00:34:31.025 –> 00:34:35.035
what you were, you know, what, what, what tips you shared?
694
00:34:35.055 –> 00:34:38.035
We could certainly, uh, en enjoy learning from
695
00:34:38.035 –> 00:34:39.075
what other people are doing.
696
00:34:49.395 –> 00:34:50.535
See if anything comes in
697
00:35:07.285 –> 00:35:08.815
very quiet on the chat bar.
698
00:35:08.885 –> 00:35:13.015
Yeah, I’m hoping that’s not an indication that that,
699
00:35:13.045 –> 00:35:15.175
that there, there is no, uh,
700
00:35:15.395 –> 00:35:16.935
no good practice that you’re aware of.
701
00:35:18.805 –> 00:35:23.075
Here we go. Oh, we’re coming in now.
702
00:35:23.905 –> 00:35:28.355
Yeah, PI’s discussing early on what career aims are. Yeah.
703
00:35:29.015 –> 00:35:31.675
Com completely, uh, agree with that.
704
00:35:31.695 –> 00:35:34.555
And I think some of our PIs had had mentioned that as well,
705
00:35:34.555 –> 00:35:36.275
that they do it from, from the beginning,
706
00:35:36.275 –> 00:35:37.725
which is really, really encouraging.
707
00:35:38.305 –> 00:35:40.965
Um, and it’s something that we’ve been thinking about, how,
708
00:35:41.105 –> 00:35:45.285
how do we encourage more PIs, if not all PIs, to,
709
00:35:45.385 –> 00:35:47.805
to be doing that rather than only having those kind
710
00:35:47.805 –> 00:35:49.405
of discussions when, when the end
711
00:35:49.405 –> 00:35:50.845
of the contract is looming.
712
00:35:51.265 –> 00:35:54.525
Um, so yeah, absolutely. Great idea.
713
00:35:54.665 –> 00:35:57.725
Was there anything else that, that people brought up?
714
00:36:03.335 –> 00:36:06.885
Let’s see. Yeah, nothing Engineering Research Futures
715
00:36:06.885 –> 00:36:07.965
promotes the training available.
716
00:36:08.315 –> 00:36:11.405
Okay. So you’ve got a, a, a dedicated kind of platform or,
717
00:36:11.465 –> 00:36:13.965
or, um, system for promoting that.
718
00:36:14.035 –> 00:36:15.845
That sounds like a great idea
719
00:36:15.905 –> 00:36:18.125
and gets around that struggle of
720
00:36:18.125 –> 00:36:19.485
where does the information go?
721
00:36:19.505 –> 00:36:20.645
And we, we put it out there
722
00:36:20.645 –> 00:36:23.685
and people don’t know structured teaching qualification
723
00:36:23.845 –> 00:36:25.805
postdocs can achieve within those 10 days.
724
00:36:26.595 –> 00:36:30.365
Yeah, yeah. And that, that the idea of teaching, you know,
725
00:36:30.365 –> 00:36:32.525
one, one of the things that we found,
726
00:36:32.745 –> 00:36:34.325
and we, we knew anecdotally
727
00:36:34.325 –> 00:36:36.725
and we got some responses on was this idea that, of course
728
00:36:37.345 –> 00:36:39.885
for many postdocs, what they want to do in terms
729
00:36:39.885 –> 00:36:42.325
of their career development is, is prepare themselves
730
00:36:42.325 –> 00:36:43.325
for an academic pathway.
731
00:36:43.625 –> 00:36:45.405
We, we are not at all suggesting that
732
00:36:45.405 –> 00:36:46.565
that shouldn’t be the case.
733
00:36:47.265 –> 00:36:50.565
Um, but for teaching comes up in different ways.
734
00:36:50.785 –> 00:36:53.205
We, we know that in there few
735
00:36:53.925 –> 00:36:56.405
postdocs have expressed in Sheffield who’ve said
736
00:36:56.405 –> 00:36:58.365
that they’ve been kind of given a teaching load
737
00:36:58.385 –> 00:37:00.125
and told that is their career development,
738
00:37:00.125 –> 00:37:02.405
which we think is not quite the spirit of,
739
00:37:02.785 –> 00:37:05.525
of the Concord Act, even though it might be constrained
740
00:37:05.525 –> 00:37:06.965
as a form of career development activity.
741
00:37:07.225 –> 00:37:10.005
So how do we encourage any form of activity,
742
00:37:10.065 –> 00:37:11.885
but make it genuinely something that
743
00:37:12.405 –> 00:37:15.205
postdocs themselves are choosing rather than something
744
00:37:15.205 –> 00:37:18.125
that’s being given to them and told, uh, that’s training
745
00:37:19.415 –> 00:37:21.125
discussion sooner rather than later.
746
00:37:21.235 –> 00:37:22.365
What is training? Yeah.
747
00:37:23.295 –> 00:37:24.725
Again, yeah, really good point there
748
00:37:24.985 –> 00:37:27.805
and something that we’re, we are trying to find a solution
749
00:37:27.805 –> 00:37:31.885
to in terms of creating some kind of a guide, uh, that,
750
00:37:31.885 –> 00:37:35.245
that specifies the types of things people might think of
751
00:37:35.265 –> 00:37:38.165
as training, but, but leaving in an element of flexibility
752
00:37:38.165 –> 00:37:41.125
because the concordant suggests that this should be up
753
00:37:41.125 –> 00:37:44.045
to the, the, the postdoc to decide what training they need
754
00:37:44.105 –> 00:37:48.485
for the, the career future that they envisage the importance
755
00:37:48.565 –> 00:37:50.045
of encouraging, filling in career plans.
756
00:37:50.625 –> 00:37:53.805
Um, uh, yeah, so, and, and,
757
00:37:53.805 –> 00:37:55.845
and that yeah, leads onto another point there.
758
00:37:56.245 –> 00:37:57.685
I, I think filling in career plans,
759
00:37:57.705 –> 00:38:00.205
but also having some way of logging, uh,
760
00:38:00.205 –> 00:38:02.405
which is another challenge that we have, you know, and,
761
00:38:02.405 –> 00:38:06.565
and something that’s on our, um, research culture strategy,
762
00:38:06.845 –> 00:38:09.685
I believe to work out well how, how do we know actually,
763
00:38:09.845 –> 00:38:11.365
’cause we’ve got lots of anecdotal evidence
764
00:38:11.365 –> 00:38:12.765
and we’ve got survey responses,
765
00:38:12.765 –> 00:38:15.605
but how could we actually know what kind
766
00:38:15.605 –> 00:38:17.445
of career development and what, what amount
767
00:38:17.445 –> 00:38:18.925
of career development people are doing?
768
00:38:19.385 –> 00:38:23.325
Can we track that in some useful way, which helps both PIs
769
00:38:23.705 –> 00:38:25.925
and postdocs to see what’s going on and,
770
00:38:25.925 –> 00:38:28.365
and where there might be room for for expansion.
771
00:38:29.375 –> 00:38:31.205
Thank you all very much for sharing those.
772
00:38:31.625 –> 00:38:35.445
I’m not gonna ask you to share your individual, um,
773
00:38:35.685 –> 00:38:38.925
thoughts about what your institution could take away
774
00:38:38.925 –> 00:38:41.405
and think about based on, on some of the things
775
00:38:41.405 –> 00:38:42.965
that you’ve heard from our experience
776
00:38:42.965 –> 00:38:44.165
here in Sheffield today.
777
00:38:45.025 –> 00:38:49.565
Um, but I’m gonna go to to, to just give you a kind of a,
778
00:38:49.965 –> 00:38:51.925
a very brief overview of some of the work
779
00:38:51.925 –> 00:38:54.245
that we are doing here at the University of Sheffield.
780
00:38:54.345 –> 00:38:58.085
So kind of block these, uh, we know that that
781
00:38:58.595 –> 00:39:01.645
knowledge is a challenge, obviously brought up by,
782
00:39:01.745 –> 00:39:05.005
by both PIs and, uh, postdocs themselves.
783
00:39:05.425 –> 00:39:06.685
We don’t know what’s out there.
784
00:39:06.865 –> 00:39:09.045
It isn’t clear when we do know that it’s out there,
785
00:39:09.045 –> 00:39:10.045
whether we’re eligible.
786
00:39:10.785 –> 00:39:14.245
Uh, we, we need a lot more information about this.
787
00:39:14.665 –> 00:39:18.685
And also, despite what feels like pushing this forever,
788
00:39:19.425 –> 00:39:22.685
we still have, uh, quite a chunk of the postdoc cohort
789
00:39:22.945 –> 00:39:23.965
and PI cohort
790
00:39:24.425 –> 00:39:27.045
who don’t know about the research development concord
791
00:39:27.385 –> 00:39:31.645
and don’t really know that there are these allocated 10 days
792
00:39:31.665 –> 00:39:34.285
of professional development time, whether one chooses
793
00:39:34.285 –> 00:39:35.805
to take them or it’s another conversation,
794
00:39:35.865 –> 00:39:39.645
but just knowing that actually there is an expectation from
795
00:39:39.645 –> 00:39:41.885
the university that, uh,
796
00:39:42.115 –> 00:39:44.925
postdoc should be taking career development time.
797
00:39:45.505 –> 00:39:49.965
Um, so, so that basic awareness is something that we need
798
00:39:49.965 –> 00:39:51.005
to keep pushing and,
799
00:39:51.025 –> 00:39:54.405
and we’re trying to figure out what the most effective ways
800
00:39:54.465 –> 00:39:57.965
of, of doing that are, um, in order
801
00:39:57.965 –> 00:40:00.885
to get those messages across to, to both groups so
802
00:40:00.885 –> 00:40:03.845
that people can, can start to take that into account
803
00:40:03.905 –> 00:40:04.925
and plan around it.
804
00:40:05.475 –> 00:40:07.845
Then as, as we’ve had in this discussion there,
805
00:40:07.845 –> 00:40:10.485
clarity about what actually counts as career development,
806
00:40:11.145 –> 00:40:13.845
um, and perhaps we, we might add onto that,
807
00:40:13.845 –> 00:40:15.845
working out some way of, of logging it,
808
00:40:16.125 –> 00:40:17.245
although that seems to be a,
809
00:40:17.365 –> 00:40:18.725
a slightly further down the line
810
00:40:18.725 –> 00:40:21.605
that at least having some clarity for us here, at least
811
00:40:21.605 –> 00:40:23.045
that clarity being the first step.
812
00:40:23.745 –> 00:40:26.725
Um, and then also we’ve been asked to,
813
00:40:26.825 –> 00:40:29.325
to create case studies to inspire
814
00:40:29.425 –> 00:40:30.965
or encourage others to do it and,
815
00:40:30.985 –> 00:40:32.045
and give a sense of, well,
816
00:40:32.065 –> 00:40:33.885
how did people organize those things?
817
00:40:34.425 –> 00:40:37.765
So, uh, I’m currently, um, I’ve got somebody working
818
00:40:37.825 –> 00:40:41.925
for me having a look at that, uh, project to, to try
819
00:40:41.925 –> 00:40:44.005
to get some material together so that there’s a,
820
00:40:44.105 –> 00:40:48.325
an update UpToDate set of, uh, resources
821
00:40:48.325 –> 00:40:50.525
that will help people to see, okay, well, yeah, actually
822
00:40:50.525 –> 00:40:52.405
that person did it this way, this is
823
00:40:52.405 –> 00:40:54.805
how they got some career development activity going.
824
00:40:55.345 –> 00:40:57.445
Um, which again, might encourage people.
825
00:40:58.495 –> 00:41:03.035
Um, then really key, I think to many things
826
00:41:03.625 –> 00:41:06.915
here is trying to ensure that, uh,
827
00:41:07.225 –> 00:41:11.355
funders make explicit their expectations of
828
00:41:11.455 –> 00:41:14.555
and support for postdoc career development activity.
829
00:41:14.975 –> 00:41:17.115
We know that a number of funders are signed up
830
00:41:17.115 –> 00:41:20.435
to the Concord Act, which states this, you know, kind of
831
00:41:21.225 –> 00:41:23.835
need for, for postdocs to take time,
832
00:41:24.215 –> 00:41:26.795
but where contracts, funding contracts
833
00:41:26.815 –> 00:41:29.115
for projects don’t mention this.
834
00:41:29.615 –> 00:41:31.875
Uh, you know, PIs are coming back
835
00:41:31.875 –> 00:41:34.165
and saying, well, I can’t, I’d love to, but I can’t
836
00:41:34.165 –> 00:41:38.805
because all of the time is contracted for, you know, for,
837
00:41:38.905 –> 00:41:41.245
for those research specific activities,
838
00:41:41.465 –> 00:41:42.525
not for career development.
839
00:41:42.585 –> 00:41:44.565
So how can we work with funders?
840
00:41:44.565 –> 00:41:46.405
And that’s something we’re trying to do particularly
841
00:41:46.405 –> 00:41:50.005
through the R 14 group and, uh, and eight work.
842
00:41:50.065 –> 00:41:53.045
You know, how can we lobby to get funders
843
00:41:53.105 –> 00:41:58.065
to make sure they’re being explicit about that, um, for,
844
00:41:58.165 –> 00:42:02.705
for, for postdoc kind of career development to really, uh,
845
00:42:03.055 –> 00:42:04.705
take, take root.
846
00:42:05.365 –> 00:42:06.425
And then how do we,
847
00:42:07.085 –> 00:42:09.065
I’m not sure incentivize is quite the right word here,
848
00:42:09.065 –> 00:42:13.505
but how do we encourage PIs themselves to, to make sure
849
00:42:13.505 –> 00:42:15.345
that their postdocs are doing this?
850
00:42:15.565 –> 00:42:19.785
You know, what mechanisms exist to us here in terms of, um,
851
00:42:20.015 –> 00:42:21.265
promotional framework
852
00:42:21.365 –> 00:42:25.305
or our academic careers path, career pathway framework, um,
853
00:42:25.965 –> 00:42:29.705
or other such incentives, recognition to ensure
854
00:42:29.705 –> 00:42:31.985
that those PIs who are, you know,
855
00:42:31.985 –> 00:42:33.585
doing really great practice here
856
00:42:33.585 –> 00:42:36.825
and being incredibly supportive of their postdocs, you know,
857
00:42:36.855 –> 00:42:38.865
feel that that is actually being recognized
858
00:42:38.865 –> 00:42:41.145
and could stand as, again, good practice to,
859
00:42:41.525 –> 00:42:42.545
to encourage others.
860
00:42:42.805 –> 00:42:46.105
And, you know, we, we, you could see from this PI network,
861
00:42:46.285 –> 00:42:48.305
the Prosper PI network, the encouragement
862
00:42:48.305 –> 00:42:51.545
that other PIs can get from, from hearing about
863
00:42:51.645 –> 00:42:54.065
how things have been done in other institutions.
864
00:42:54.645 –> 00:42:58.905
Um, you know, so we, we really need to kind of make sure
865
00:42:58.905 –> 00:43:01.545
that PIs who who are, you know,
866
00:43:01.545 –> 00:43:03.745
doing this great practice are being recognized
867
00:43:03.745 –> 00:43:08.305
and those who aren’t, are being encouraged in supportive
868
00:43:08.335 –> 00:43:10.665
ways rather than kind of top down.
869
00:43:10.805 –> 00:43:13.305
You will do this types of ways to,
870
00:43:13.325 –> 00:43:14.385
to really make this happen
871
00:43:14.385 –> 00:43:16.825
because they are such an important influence
872
00:43:17.405 –> 00:43:19.945
in our post-doc career development as, as we all know.
873
00:43:21.555 –> 00:43:24.775
So that’s pretty much what I had to say.
874
00:43:24.995 –> 00:43:29.455
Uh, I wanted to leave you with a thought here, um, about
875
00:43:30.605 –> 00:43:33.295
kind of building on what you may have been discussing in
876
00:43:33.295 –> 00:43:35.815
your breakout groups, which those barriers,
877
00:43:36.195 –> 00:43:38.455
I’m sure there’ll be several which have resonated with,
878
00:43:38.525 –> 00:43:39.655
with, with many of you,
879
00:43:39.675 –> 00:43:41.855
but is the one that you can identify that
880
00:43:42.575 –> 00:43:44.975
actually could be a really good target
881
00:43:45.315 –> 00:43:46.815
for some kind of action.
882
00:43:47.515 –> 00:43:49.975
Um, and, and what is it that you think you
883
00:43:49.975 –> 00:43:54.815
or your institution might be able to do to start dismantling
884
00:43:54.815 –> 00:43:57.695
that barrier and to, to, to start encouraging
885
00:43:58.285 –> 00:44:01.175
more postdoc uptake of career development activity,
886
00:44:01.535 –> 00:44:05.815
particularly with a focus as, as we’ve had here on, uh,
887
00:44:05.825 –> 00:44:08.095
engagement with non-academic partners.
888
00:44:08.375 –> 00:44:11.255
Although any career development activity is,
889
00:44:11.315 –> 00:44:14.015
is good career development activity in, in my view.
890
00:44:15.835 –> 00:44:17.615
So I’m going to leave you with those thoughts.
891
00:44:17.995 –> 00:44:19.615
Um, we have a few minutes left.
892
00:44:19.875 –> 00:44:23.215
I’m at the end of my, uh, of my talk
893
00:44:23.875 –> 00:44:26.735
and I’d be very happy if anybody has any questions to,
894
00:44:26.835 –> 00:44:29.175
to try to answer them to the best of my knowledge.
895
00:44:33.455 –> 00:44:35.315
Thanks, Rebecca. I’m just gonna jump in
896
00:44:35.315 –> 00:44:38.275
before any questions to say that this session will be
897
00:44:38.915 –> 00:44:40.795
uploaded to Prosper portal.
898
00:44:41.415 –> 00:44:44.435
Um, we will send out the link, uh, with the event.
899
00:44:45.295 –> 00:44:47.515
Um, and we’d also just like to, um,
900
00:44:47.535 –> 00:44:48.995
launch a quick poll as well.
901
00:44:49.695 –> 00:44:52.675
Um, if you bear with me one second, I’ll do that.
902
00:44:53.335 –> 00:44:55.315
Um, but yeah, any questions for Rebecca?
903
00:45:10.725 –> 00:45:12.235
Thank I can see your hand up.
904
00:45:13.335 –> 00:45:15.075
Hi. Yeah, uh, sorry, I just thought, oh, I,
905
00:45:15.195 –> 00:45:16.315
I jump in cheekily.
906
00:45:16.575 –> 00:45:18.955
Um, so, um, thank you so much Rebecca, uh,
907
00:45:19.055 –> 00:45:20.915
for your fascinating talk.
908
00:45:21.175 –> 00:45:25.035
Um, I just wanted to ask if you noticed any trends in the,
909
00:45:25.495 –> 00:45:28.755
um, PI responses that you received in terms of their level
910
00:45:28.775 –> 00:45:33.355
of experience or seniority as a, as a PI in the support
911
00:45:33.505 –> 00:45:35.995
that they were willing were they were willing to give
912
00:45:35.995 –> 00:45:37.555
or gave to their postdocs?
913
00:45:39.355 –> 00:45:41.315
A good, good question in terms of raw numbers
914
00:45:41.375 –> 00:45:43.395
and we, we have, we have graphs and slides,
915
00:45:43.415 –> 00:45:44.915
but I couldn’t fit everything in.
916
00:45:45.415 –> 00:45:49.355
Yes, it does seem that the more experience very crudely put,
917
00:45:49.355 –> 00:45:52.475
the more experienced postdocs are more comfortable in
918
00:45:52.715 –> 00:45:54.755
allowing people to undertake, uh,
919
00:45:54.815 –> 00:45:56.315
career development activity and,
920
00:45:56.335 –> 00:45:58.835
and being, you know, openly supportive of that
921
00:45:58.835 –> 00:46:00.315
and encouraging those conversations.
922
00:46:00.495 –> 00:46:02.835
That’s obviously a very crude kind of thing
923
00:46:02.835 –> 00:46:05.275
and there are variations even within those groups.
924
00:46:05.455 –> 00:46:07.315
But, but crudely speaking, yes.
925
00:46:07.895 –> 00:46:10.355
Um, and in terms of being informed
926
00:46:10.375 –> 00:46:12.715
and understanding about, you know, the kind
927
00:46:12.715 –> 00:46:15.715
of the various mechanisms, there’s obviously an advantage
928
00:46:16.135 –> 00:46:18.915
or, or, or increase in that awareness as people are
929
00:46:19.495 –> 00:46:21.035
in the institution for longer.
930
00:46:21.555 –> 00:46:24.795
Although some people’s, some responses were indicative
931
00:46:24.795 –> 00:46:27.155
that people had actually brought awareness at least
932
00:46:27.155 –> 00:46:30.475
of the concordant with them from other institutions rather
933
00:46:30.475 –> 00:46:33.715
than necessarily gained it, uh, here in Sheffield.
934
00:46:34.405 –> 00:46:37.435
Great, thank you so much. You are welcome. Fi
935
00:46:39.385 –> 00:46:41.585
I have one more question, Rebecca from Ola.
936
00:46:48.405 –> 00:46:50.255
Yeah, Ola is, is, is this
937
00:46:50.295 –> 00:46:53.815
A, i I couldn’t import my microphone on.
938
00:46:53.965 –> 00:46:57.895
Okay. Uh, so my question is about, so you can, I,
939
00:46:58.035 –> 00:47:00.135
I’m not bas in UK now, but uh,
940
00:47:00.355 –> 00:47:02.495
but I was basing there, so did,
941
00:47:02.555 –> 00:47:06.295
you spoke about the definition of how count, what counts.
942
00:47:06.635 –> 00:47:08.735
So we don’t have this of the eight days
943
00:47:08.735 –> 00:47:10.095
that you have in the concordant
944
00:47:10.275 –> 00:47:12.535
and would be very difficult to implement that thing here.
945
00:47:12.635 –> 00:47:17.615
But, um, what is for you, so what count
946
00:47:17.995 –> 00:47:21.005
as, uh, researcher development days?
947
00:47:21.625 –> 00:47:25.125
So what is affected, uh, in general
948
00:47:25.385 –> 00:47:28.405
and is affected by the PIs? Uh, so
949
00:47:28.625 –> 00:47:30.965
It, it’s, it’s a really good question and it’s a challenge
950
00:47:30.985 –> 00:47:33.725
and something that we need to clarify further
951
00:47:33.725 –> 00:47:38.245
because as I kind of mentioned, some PIs seem to, uh,
952
00:47:38.455 –> 00:47:42.245
count any activity, any training as career development,
953
00:47:42.245 –> 00:47:44.085
and we wouldn’t necessarily put that
954
00:47:44.085 –> 00:47:45.725
as such if it’s mandatory training.
955
00:47:46.505 –> 00:47:51.125
Um, some PIs, uh, felt that any teaching activity counted
956
00:47:51.225 –> 00:47:52.285
as career development, whether
957
00:47:52.285 –> 00:47:54.485
or not that was something the postdoc had chosen
958
00:47:55.025 –> 00:47:56.605
for themselves or whether it had
959
00:47:56.605 –> 00:47:57.725
simply been assigned to them.
960
00:47:57.865 –> 00:48:00.885
So it is a piece of work that’s kind of ongoing thinking,
961
00:48:00.885 –> 00:48:03.925
well, how can we create something that gives flexibility,
962
00:48:04.785 –> 00:48:06.565
uh, but some kind of clarity
963
00:48:06.565 –> 00:48:09.245
because we did have PI responses saying, look what you,
964
00:48:09.245 –> 00:48:11.005
what, what, we don’t know what this is, so
965
00:48:11.005 –> 00:48:12.565
how can we know whether people are doing it
966
00:48:12.745 –> 00:48:16.005
or encourage it when it, it’s such a broad statement.
967
00:48:16.105 –> 00:48:17.765
So I think it’s a really good point.
968
00:48:17.825 –> 00:48:20.725
It it’s, there isn’t at the moment a crystal answer for us.
969
00:48:20.785 –> 00:48:22.125
We, it’s something that that,
970
00:48:22.275 –> 00:48:24.845
that we are working on developing, trying
971
00:48:24.885 –> 00:48:25.925
to understand what that is.
972
00:48:26.225 –> 00:48:29.085
The focus of this particular study, uh,
973
00:48:29.465 –> 00:48:33.085
was career development engagement with activities such
974
00:48:33.085 –> 00:48:35.765
as knowledge exchange or consultancy or secondment,
975
00:48:36.065 –> 00:48:38.885
but that’s obviously a kind of a subset anyway of everything
976
00:48:38.885 –> 00:48:42.005
that could be counted as career development activity.
977
00:48:44.075 –> 00:48:46.685
Because for us, for example, some PIs count
978
00:48:47.585 –> 00:48:51.845
if the postdoc is applying for a fellowship in another place
979
00:48:51.985 –> 00:48:55.965
for the next position and, and they need this extra time.
980
00:48:56.665 –> 00:48:58.485
So this is, so that counts more than eight days
981
00:48:58.505 –> 00:49:00.325
of this is more than eight days.
982
00:49:00.385 –> 00:49:04.765
And say, I’m giving you the, the timing is kind of in,
983
00:49:05.065 –> 00:49:06.165
in your duties, right?
984
00:49:06.385 –> 00:49:08.525
And to, and, and to apply for funding
985
00:49:09.065 –> 00:49:11.285
and, uh, yeah, it’s kind of, you are writing a project,
986
00:49:11.305 –> 00:49:13.405
you are learning, you are developing your career.
987
00:49:13.905 –> 00:49:15.725
So this count as career development.
988
00:49:15.835 –> 00:49:17.925
Yeah. And, and if, if, if that, you know, I think that
989
00:49:18.515 –> 00:49:20.245
some of the owners or some of the,
990
00:49:20.345 –> 00:49:23.245
the emphasis I think on in the research development Concord
991
00:49:23.245 –> 00:49:25.845
Act itself is that this should be something that the, is
992
00:49:25.845 –> 00:49:27.445
what the, the, um,
993
00:49:28.035 –> 00:49:30.805
postdoc themselves understands as career development.
994
00:49:30.805 –> 00:49:33.005
But obviously there is a process in negotiation
995
00:49:33.005 –> 00:49:35.125
and if you said, well, actually I’m gonna need extra time
996
00:49:35.125 –> 00:49:38.285
to fill in a fellowship application and I want 12 days to go
997
00:49:38.565 –> 00:49:41.645
and do some work, shadowing or placement
998
00:49:41.645 –> 00:49:43.805
or whatever can understand that
999
00:49:43.805 –> 00:49:45.205
for PIs, that’s really tricky.
1000
00:49:45.425 –> 00:49:48.005
So this is where we, we do need to kind
1001
00:49:48.005 –> 00:49:51.605
of be a bit clearer about what we as, as essential kind
1002
00:49:51.605 –> 00:49:53.365
of part of the university understand and,
1003
00:49:53.365 –> 00:49:57.325
and do that in negotiation with, uh, postdocs
1004
00:49:57.545 –> 00:50:00.045
and with the PIs who, who at the end of the day are,
1005
00:50:00.105 –> 00:50:02.965
are carrying the responsibility of completing their project.
1006
00:50:03.145 –> 00:50:04.805
And, and that’s such an important part.
1007
00:50:06.455 –> 00:50:06.925
Thank you.
1008
00:50:15.395 –> 00:50:19.505
Great. Thanks Rebecca. I think it looks like we’re done.
1009
00:50:21.145 –> 00:50:23.185
Brilliant. Well thank you very much for this opportunity
1010
00:50:23.245 –> 00:50:25.705
and thank you everybody for your questions and your comments
1011
00:50:26.205 –> 00:50:27.425
and for participating.
1012
00:50:28.045 –> 00:50:29.465
Thanks for the wonderful session.
1013
00:50:29.765 –> 00:50:33.545
So many great insight, I think there. So thanks so much.
Shared learnings
- Most postdocs surveyed reported interest in engaging with non-academic career development activity – no-one reported zero interest.
- Most postdocs surveyed thought that one day a month was reasonable, interestingly the PIs surveyed were slightly more generous than this.
- However, less than half of the postdocs reported actually spending one day a month on career development, whereas PIs reported that more than half of their own postdocs were spending at least one day a month or more on career development – suggesting a disconnect.
- Common refrains/barriers reported by the postdocs included: the perception that they should use annual leave for career development (CD); a lack of awareness of their entitlement to CD days, a lack of knowledge about opportunities and resources; a lack of time with primary research workload and priorities; confidence issues; uncertainty around whether their career will see a benefit from engaging in CD; wider life responsibilities such as family/caring commitments.
- Postdocs reported mixed feelings about whether they perceive PIs as supportive of non-academic CD activity – generally speaking the perception was positive so long as the development activity was enthusiastic and planned out, with a slump in positive perceptions among the 1-2 years-as-postdoc group.
- Almost a quarter of postdocs reported not having broached the subject with their PIs, whereas around 78% of PIs said they’d raised the topic with their postdocs.
- Common refrains/barriers reported by PIs included: a lack of time; their postdocs being 100% funded via the grant; mandatory training that’s a bit pointless fills up the allocated time, leaving only personal time for meaningful CD; lack of knowledge (‘how do I help them do this even if I want to?’); lack of clarity and flexibility on definitions, e.g. too much focus on academic careers, sometimes non-academia options seen as “not counting”.
- Postdoc uptake of opportunities can be increased through: Raising awareness of entitlement to CD days, existing mechanisms and eligibility for those; explicit PI support for CD and active discussion of opportunities; and shared insights from other researchers’ CD experiences.
- PIs are more likely to support postdoc career development activity if: Clear guidance is given on what counts as CD are available; institutional structures and incentives for supporting CD activity are regularly communicated to all PIs; and funders are explicit about expectations of postdoc CD activity.
- Institutions can foster postdoc career development by: Ongoing promotion of Concordat-mandated CD days to both postdocs and PIs; ensuring that institutional mechanisms such as KE and consultancy are accessible to postdocs; and collecting cross-faculty data on CD uptake to identify good practice.
- PIs that want to better support their postdocs' CD should consider 1) Embracing and encouraging curiosity that looks beyond academic research, 2) Build CD conversations into meetings with their postdocs, 3) Inform themselves of existing support for non-academic career development and how postdocs can access this within their institution.