Funding and recruiting postdocs
Supporting the career development of your postdocs starts long before they join your research project. The earlier you consider the potential development needs of your postdocs, the more they’ll get from working for you.
On this page we explore how you can support postdocs at the grant application and postdoc recruitment stages.
Funding
Funding organisations are moving away from the ‘fund and forget’ model of research and considering the needs of those delivering research. Funders are recognising the importance of every team member, including postdocs, and the detrimental impact of the current funding model.
‘Postdocs are the vital engine of research and without them the UK would be unable to deliver world-leading bioscience research and research outcomes.’
UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) People and Teams 2023 Action Plan made it clear that the funding agency (which includes the six research councils, Research England, Innovate UK and the STFC) considers staff development as an “important outcome of research projects”. Similarly, Wellcome’s 2022 Continuing Professional Development policy states that “CPD should be integrated into all roles to allow people to grow to their full potential”.
Funders are looking for PIs to demonstrate greater people management and leadership skills.
UKRI intends to reward project leaders who “support the careers of their staff” and are going to embed “incentives for workforce development in grant assessments” (UKRI 2023).
The European Research Council evaluates research proposals on two areas: the research project and the principal investigator themselves, who must demonstrate “sound leadership in the training and advancement of young scientists” (ERC Advanced Grants 2023).
Recently I've managed to use grant funding to support some of my PDRAs to do product management training.
Prof Rachel Williams, Professor of Ophthalmic Bioengineering, University of Liverpool.
- Are funding bodies providing additional funding to support this?
Despite their policy statements, most funders aren’t currently providing additional funding for staff development that isn’t directly related to the funded project. Instead, research institutions are expected to be providing development opportunities through internal researcher development teams, funding schemes or other resources.
Check individual funding scheme notes to see what is and isn’t permissible. For instance, Wellcome provides funding for project-specific skills training but expects “organisations to provide and fund career-based continuing professional development” (Wellcome 2022). However, if the organisation can’t provide quality professional development that meets the standard and range of needs that Wellcome deems minimal for research staff, then small amounts of additional funding can be included in the grant application.
What support and development opportunities does your organisation provide for postdoc development?
Writing funding applications
Funders are looking for evidence of applicants leading and managing their research staff and supporting their development. When considering applications, UKRI grant assessors look for:
- How will you develop and maintain your own people leadership and management skills?
- How will you support the career and professional development of your team members for a broad range of roles and careers? How will you make a difference to the career path of your research postdoc?
- How have you demonstrated your ability to develop others and maintain effective working relationships?
The announcements by funding bodies about assessing opportunities for staff development in grant application are, at the time of writing, very recent. As a result, few funders have begun to implement any changes and little guidance for managers exists.
Currently the best place to articulate how you support the development of others is in a narrative CV, if the funding scheme you are applying to uses one. Module 2 of UKRI’s Resume for Research and Innovation is headed ‘The development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships’. When writing a narrative CV, remember to provide examples, describing what you did and what the outcome was as a result. How did your postdoc, PhD student, technician or colleague benefit from the actions you took?
Development costs
When planning your project, consider the potential costs of staff development and what other resources might be needed.
“I think some of it should be done at the application stage and make sure that you’ve budgeted in correctly for their time but also that there’s a budget for their training. I think it’s really unfortunate if there’s a postdoc without some conference attendance funding attached or training attached, so for the last bids I’ve been involved with I’ve included some money for that.”
Dr Siobhan McAndrew, Senior Lecturer in Quantitative Social Science, University of Bristol
Factor in the time for development
Institutions that are signatories of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers should provide their research staff with at least 10 days of continual professional development a year.
The 10 days of professional development recommended by the Concordat is in addition to project-specific skills training or other project-related activities. For example, time taken to write a research paper based on the project, whilst undoubtedly beneficial for your postdoc’s career, is not part of their 10 days professional development.
Over a three-year postdoc position, at least one whole month should be devoted to professional development activities. That’s one month less spent on your research project so make sure to account for that in your planning.
Recruitment
Recruitment is the most important stage of your project. Recruiting the right person in a fair and transparent manner is better for you, your research and the applicants. Be aware that recruitment processes can be subject to conscious and unconscious biases.
The job advert
The job advert is the first opportunity to sell your organisation and research project. Writing a good job advert can mean the difference between getting a great postdoc or not finding someone suitable.
Plan: Good recruitment takes planning. Before writing the advert, make sure you have defined the role clearly – what are the job requirements, the skills needed and the key expectations. Your HR department may be able to give you advice on how to perform a ‘post evaluation’ should you feel it necessary. What are the visa implications should an international researcher apply?
Clarity: The recruitment text should be clear, concise and accessible, providing the reader with the essential information they need to know about the role and your team.
‘Try and think like an ‘outsider.’ Things that you take for granted, flexible working, community activities or industry placements may be unique to your organisation, and something that candidates aspire to.’
N8CIR 2022
Language: Ensure the language you use is inclusive to prevent exclusion of under-represented groups (NERC 2022). Gendered language, for instance, might put off female candidates from applying. You can check the recruitment text using an online gender-decoder tool.
Imagery: In recruitment materials ensure that the imagery used is reflective of a diverse community, helping to encourage a broad range of applicants (NERC 2022).
Advertising: Advertise your position widely and create a short version of recruitment text to ‘advertise the ad’ on social media, LinkedIn, and field-specific websites, in addition to the standard home institute website and FindAPostDoc (Hill 2022; NERC 2022).
‘The more people who see your vacancy the more chance you have to recruit the best available candidate and the more inclusive the process is.’
N8CIR 2022
Opportunities: The job advert enables you to inform candidates about the culture and environment of your team and institution. Be clear about the level of support available throughout the post (NERC 2022). Demonstrating in the advert that you care about the career development of your postdocs may help you to attract a broader range of applicants and allow you to select the very best.
“I feel like as a PI I’ve grown a bit of a reputation of being supportive and supporting others.”
Prof Melissa Gladstone, Professor in Neurodevelopmental Paediatrics and International Child Health, University of Liverpool
The interview
Job interviews can be stressful for interviewees and interviewers alike. Plan and prepare for the interview process to make it fair and alleviate stress.
Shortlisting: Ensure that the scoring process of applications is fair and transparent. Use a standardised quantitative shortlisting matrix with pre-defined scoring criteria and provide those involved with shortlisting with clear guidance (NERC 2022).
The interviewee: Consider the needs of the applicant. Ask in advance whether they have any accessibility needs or require special adjustments. Provide plenty of time between inviting applicants to interview and the interview itself, especially if they are required to do any tasks in advance or prepare a presentation. Applicants with caring responsibilities find it harder to make time around their work and other duties. Similarly, provide options for interview date and time to accommodate individual applicant circumstances, and schedule interview times within core childcare hours.
The interview panel: All members of the interview panel should be clear on their role and the agenda for the interview. Provide the panel with guidance and links to your institution’s recruitment practices. Try to have a diverse panel (for example, gender, ethnicity, career stage) without putting disproportionate pressure on staff from minority backgrounds who may be frequently called upon for such duties.
The interview: Be transparent and fair about the interview process and use a clear marking system to score responses. Ask the same basic questions to each candidate, following up with individual questions as relevant. Try to avoid lengthy questions with multiple parts and try not to interrupt during answers. Help the interviewee to return to the main points if they stray during an answer, and if they haven’t answered the question, you can reframe it to ask them again. Schedule breaks between interviews to ensure that your panel’s mood isn’t impacted by tiredness. Be aware of the different types of question, what they can be used for and how an interviewee may respond to them.
Expand the section below to find out more:
Open questions (who, which, what, when, how) get an applicant talking and provide you with information about them. For example: ‘What research techniques have you experience of in this field?’
Closed questions can help you get a straight answer but are harder for the candidate to expand upon. For example: ‘Have you ever done [research technique]?
Experience-based questions allow you to find out about a candidate’s attitudes and experiences. For example: ‘Can you describe an example of when you have used [research technique]?’
Probing questions allow you to follow up an answer and test a candidate’s understanding a little further. For example: ‘When performing [research technique] how have you dealt with [specific complication of research technique]?’
Summarising questions can be used to make sure you understand what the candidate has told you. For example: ‘So you found that using [research technique] lead to a rise in [output]?’
Hypothetical questions can be useful to test how a candidate deals with an unexpected situation or something of which they have no direct experience. However, be aware that hypothetical questions also provide more opportunities for the candidate to say what they think you want to hear, rather than how they’d actually respond. For example: ‘What would you do if you were performing [research technique] and [specific complication] happened?’
In the brief video below, intercultural coach Sally Walker discusses practical tips for interviews in multicultural settings.
Hi, I’m Sally Walker, director of SW Career Coaching Limited, and I’m a career and intercultural coach. I’ll be guiding you through this video, which is designed to help you, as PIs, gain top intercultural tips to use when working in multicultural work settings; in particular, when carrying out interviews, leading and participating in meetings, and in the use of email.
The aim in so doing is that you develop more effective relationships at work and achieve greater collaboration and productivity. Please do refer to the accompanying workbook as well for full information and further resources.
As a result of engaging with this recording and the workbook, I hope that you’ll become more consciously aware of when unexpected intercultural incidents are occurring and will have gained some key intercultural tips to address these situations going forward.
Here is an outline on screen of our agenda. Let’s remind ourselves of the definition on screen of intercultural competence as the measure of your effectiveness when interacting with others who don’t share the same cultural background as you.
It’s helpful to reflect how regularly you consciously demonstrate the skills and attitudes, which combine to make up intercultural competence or global mindset. Where have you shown a tolerance for newness or uncertainty recently? Where have you used the skills of active listening, asking questions, reflecting back what’s been said by paraphrasing, and then suspending judgement whilst you evaluate a situation? How do you build trusting relationships, showing empathy and sensitive cultural curiosity? How would you rate your language, foreign language skills, and how comfortable are you with different types of non-verbal behaviour?
Organisational cultures in academia and beyond can vary widely. Cultures are fluid rather than fixed; as a PI you have an opportunity to influence and even create the culture within your multicultural research teams. When you interact with somebody who is operating to a different set of cultural norms to your own, it’s possible that you might experience a sense of surprise, tension, or even conflict at certain points.
These unexpected moments can be described as intercultural incidents. They most frequently happen when you’re first meeting someone from a different cultural background. For example, during the recruitment process; at initial meetings; when exchanging gifts; during the appraisal process; via our email communication. In addition to the top intercultural tips that I’m going to share with you in a moment, you can also use the dimensional framework and three-R model which are mentioned in the Building A Multicultural Team Culture Using Intercultural Competence video on the Prosper website, to help you interpret and learn from these incidents.
As a PI, you’re likely to be involved in the application and interview processes of your academic institution. As mentioned earlier, when you’re reviewing an application, or carrying out an interview with an individual with a different cultural background to your own, it’s possible that unexpected intercultural incidents might arise.
So, first off, raise your awareness of this possibility. In addition, aim to put yourself in the shoes of the interviewee. What different intercultural expectations might they have of this situation? What interview style might they be more familiar with? If you’re unsure, then seek out the advice of an intercultural mentor, somebody who’s familiar with the applicant’s culture in question. Do be conscious of the important intercultural concept of saving face and ensure that you make the applicant feel welcome and respected.
The applicant may treat you with more deference than you’re used to, for example, by preferring to use titles rather than first-name terms. You can ask them to adopt your cultural norm; be accepting if they find that challenging to do so, if at all. Do make sure to monitor your assumptions about acceptable body language and non-verbal behaviour.
Don’t assume that all cultures have the same norms. Nodding and shaking heads, eye contact or no eye contact, can all mean very different things depending on the cultural background of the individual you’re interviewing. If you come from a culture where eye contact is viewed as a mark of honesty and sincerity, and the lack of eye contact suggests a lack of trustworthiness or self-confidence, then do remember that in some cultures a lack of direct eye contact reflects respect for seniority.
Do be accommodating of language challenges, consciously speak more slowly and clearly, and aim to avoid jargon and institution-specific acronyms. Agree that it’s acceptable to ask for the applicants to repeat something and for them to ask you to do so as well.
Be aware of your own preferences as an interviewer. Do you have an informal or a more formal style, which might indicate preference for either egalitarian or hierarchical culture? Are you task or relationship orientated? If the former, then interviews you conduct are likely to be results-focused, diving in straight away to competency-type questions. If the latter, and you’re relationship-orientated, you would concentrate on building rapport, discussing common interests or connections between yourself and the applicant.
Ideally, I would aim for a combination of the two approaches, so that whatever the applicant’s own preference or expectation is, they will feel comfortable with at least part of the interview.
Finally, consider if you have an explicit communication style, meaning you’re naturally direct, or if you have a more indirect preference. If the latter, then you might need to consciously simplify your questions and make their intent more explicit, particularly if the applicant doesn’t share the same mother tongue as you.
Whether you’re leading or participating in a multicultural meeting, the following strategies may help to demonstrate your intercultural competence and achieve more effective outcomes. Aim to gain a balance of task and relationship building in the meeting, where you create time for introductions and interactions.
You could include a cultural icebreaker activity at the start of a meeting, such as the Culture Flower Exercise, which is demonstrated in the video entitled Cultural Identity and Assessing Your Current Level of Intercultural Competence on the Prosper website.
In addition, what about agreeing on a longer communal lunch period or more coffee breaks for interaction? In a meeting, do all that you can to help participants find common ground together by introducing knowledge of their culture into the content of the meeting. For example, by including words from their language into a presentation or by celebrating special cultural dates.
Another useful tip to ensure more equal engagement in a meeting is allow time for team members to write down questions or comments and share them, potentially anonymously, in advance rather than seeking spontaneous input during the meeting. Culturally, this is far more likely to lessen verbal power and status issues and will also better accommodate those who have a more reflective preference.
Finally, in terms of our third set of top intercultural tips, these relate to how you communicate via email in a multicultural environment, particularly where colleagues or postdocs don’t all share a common mother tongue or fluent language ability. Focus on sharing factual information in your emails rather than criticism or emotions. Aim to keep your email relatively short, simple, and polite. Make clear what’s being requested, and within what timeframe. Be very sensitive about using jargon or slang or proverbs, complex words, and acronyms, in case your reader is unfamiliar with these. So, keep these to a minimum.
Obviously, they might lead otherwise to misunderstanding or might highlight a power status difference. Remember to be sensitive as to how you address people. Echo their use of titles and credentials. In general, always aim to respond rather than react to emails.
Consider if you might be misinterpreting what someone else has written, or the tone used, due to cultural differences. Let things cool off overnight before replying. Finally, I’d recommend that you don’t rely on email. Make the effort and take time to communicate in a variety of ways, including phone, video, platform, and face-to-face, to build trust and common agreement and to avoid misunderstandings. The effort taken to build multicultural relationships will mean that your project or research task actually will get completed more quickly. I hope that you’ve now refreshed your understanding of the concept of organisational cultures and recognised your opportunity as a PI to build an effective team culture.
I hope too that you appreciate the impact of intercultural competence when you’re interviewing, leading or participating in meetings, and using email; that you feel you’ve gained numerous practical tips for better handling these specific situations in future where intercultural incidents frequently arise. Please do refer to the list of resources included in the workbook for further information on the topics covered here. Please do reach out, stay in touch, and let me know if you have any queries or comments.
[END OF TRANSCRIPT]
Development: ‘Where do you see yourself in 5 years time?’ is a common interview question, but what are you looking for with this question and what can you do with that knowledge? Make a note of how each applicant responds to this question. Their answer may provide a starting point for career discussions when they start with you and can allow you to start considering their needs and the opportunities they might have in advance of their arrival.
Post interview
After the interview comes the decision and offer. As with all stages of the postdoc recruitment process, the responsibility to endure this is fair, transparent and inclusive is often left up to you as PI. In the majority of cases
‘postdoc hiring happens at the discretion of PIs, and they are hardly held accountable for their hiring decisions.’
Herschberg et al. 2018
Deciding: After all interviews are complete, provide the panel with time to reflect individually on the candidates without pressuring them with group think. When deciding, critically evaluate your reasoning and try to base decisions on the criteria rather than a ‘gut feeling’. You might not find a candidate who has everything – work out what matters for your project and what doesn’t.
‘I have also learnt that you can’t teach ambition or motivation, but you can teach skills.’
Hill 2022
Avoid biases: Be aware of your own unconscious biases to ensure the decision process is fair. The profile of the ‘ideal postdoc’ is sometimes described as “someone who gives total priority to work and has no outside interests and responsibilities” but staff wellbeing aside, this can act as an exclusionary mechanism in recruitment. For example, studies show that this constructed ‘ideal’ is gendered, encompassing masculine characteristics and therefore women academics are expected not to fit the ideal (Herschberg et al. 2018).
‘Those from marginalized backgrounds face extra hurdles because of undue bias in faculty hiring.’
Landhuis 2023
For all candidates: It is good interview practice to get back to all candidates within a week of the final interview, if possible, and to provide constructive feedback to all without them having to ask. You may also wish to have a mechanism for gathering feedback from candidates to be able to improve the process in the future.
For the successful candidate: Discovering you’ve been successful via a phone call or email is a great feeling after the stress of the application and interview process. But for most postdocs little can be done until they’ve received their contract. Try to work with your HR department to ensure that the successful candidate gets their contract within two weeks. In addition to reassuring them about their position, for those relocating this means that they’re able to start planning their move or even obtaining a visa if necessary.
Negotiation: You might find that when you make an offer there is a period of negotiation, over salary, working patterns or other issues. Be aware of what is and isn’t negotiable for your project – do they need to travel, does the research require that they need to be on site most days? Are there any additional development opportunities you can offer to help with the negotiation? Whilst uncommon within academia, negotiations over job offers still do occur and your HR department may be able to provide you with advice or support.
Finding the right postdoc
Most postdoc positions are funded through grant applications where there is often little time between being told that your application was successful and the project itself starting.
This time pressure means that recruitment of postdocs is often organised in a hasty and informal manner, with PIs focussing on the short-term: a postdoc who can start quickly, do the job and is likely to stay for the duration of the project (Herschberg et al. 2018).
‘It’s important to remember that looking for a postdoc to join your lab goes beyond research. We are training future leaders.’
Hill 2022
This sacrifice of quality for low-risk availability means that the selected candidate might not be the best long-term option, for you or your postdoc.
‘PIs tend to select an ‘ideal’ type postdoc who is value-added to a project, rather than someone who they evaluate from a broader perspective, as someone who is deemed suitable for a further career in academia. As a result, the postdoc position seems to have become a job, rather than a career step.’
Herschberg et al. 2018
If the recruitment process hasn’t resulted in a postdoc you are confident in, then it’s perfectly ok to advertise the role again. Whilst the time pressure of a project is an important consideration, having somebody that is not that interested in the project, or is just not a good fit, does not benefit anyone (Hill 2022).
“Better to have nobody in post than somebody who is not able to perform well enough.”
Reader in Infectious Diseases, University of Liverpool
And finally
At the end of the recruitment process perform a post evaluation to establish what worked, what didn’t work, and what changes might need to be put in place for the next recruitment cycle.
References
Herschberg, C., Benschop, Y. & van den Brink, M. 2018. Precarious postdocs: A comparative study on recruitment and selection of early-career researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(4), pp303-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.10.001
Hill, C. 2022. A lab leader’s guide to hiring a postdoc. Nature, 607, 624-625. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01729-5
Landhuis, E. 2023. To diversify the scientific workforce, postdoc recruitment needs a rethink. Nature 618, 201-203. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01740-4
N8 Centre of Excellence in Computationally Intensive Research. 2022. EDI Recruitment Checklist. Accessed 12/06/2023 https://n8cir.org.uk/documents/140/2022_05_09_recrtuitment_checklist_K3EWMHP.pdf
NERC. 2022. NERC best practice principles in doctoral recruitment. Accessed 12/06/2023 https://www.ukri.org/publications/nerc-best-practice-principles-in-doctoral-recruitment/